🚀 go-pugleaf

In article H6gVXB4w165w@kalki33.lakes.trenton.sc.us, system@kalki33.lakes.trenton.sc.us (Kalki Dasa) writes:
>arromdee@jyusenkyou.cs.jhu.edu (Ken Arromdee) writes:
>
>> In article <TBiqXB3w165w@kalki33.lakes.trenton.sc.us> system@kalki33.lakes.tr
>> >What he said was that the astronauts never went to the moon, and his
>> >reason was that the moon is impossible to reach by mankind's present
>> >technology,
>> 
>> Well, was he right?
>
>The astronauts certainly never went to the planet Chandraloka as it is
>described in the Vedas. This planet, whose name is commonly translated
>as "the Moon," is populated by intelligent living beings in an advanced
>state of civilization, and is not reachable by ordinary mechanical
>means.
>

That's nice.

So where did the astronauts go? We like to call it the "moon", but
this does not seem to coincide with your concept of what the moon is,
and where it is. So what IS that big chunk of rock orbiting the earth,
which astronauts visited and discovered no life upon? THIS satalite
is clearly reachable my mechanical means.

Basically I dont think we're talking about the same celestial body here.

And why would anyone be silly enough to translate "Chandraloka"
as "the Moon", if Chandraloka is a planet?

---
			- Dan Johnson
And God said "Jeeze, this is dull"... and it *WAS* dull. Genesis 0:0

These opinions have had all identifiying marks removed, and are untraceable.
You'll never know whose they are.