🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <8okTXB1w165w@kalki33.lakes.trenton.sc.us> system@kalki33.lakes.trenton.sc.us (Kalki Dasa) writes:
>gtclark@festival.ed.ac.uk (G T Clark) writes:
>
>> 	While the "Eve" hypothesis is not proven,and is in my view
>I posted the following article some time ago, but since the
>"Mitochondrial Eve" issue seems to be coming into vogue again, here it
>is one more time:
>
>From Back to Godhead magazine, Sept/Oct 1992
>
>WAS THERE AN EVE?
>

  What a disappointing article.  I licked my lips as I started in on
  the first couple of pages, thinking it was going to be an
  excellent scientific treatise on a subject that I'm not terribly
  well informed on.  Only after wading trough the whole article do I
  finally discover that it is as mired in mysticism and religious
  drek as any creationist story.

  Oh well.  Just goes to show what happens when you hold unrealistic
  hopes for alt.atheism.  Kind of like firing up 'rn' and watching
  half of the posted articles disappear in a single abortion kill
  file entry.


/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ 

Bob Beauchaine bobbe@vice.ICO.TEK.COM 

"Look, I tried the cat experiment.  On the third trial, the cat was
dead.  On each of the subsequent 413 trials, it remained dead.  Am I
doing something wrong?"
			James Nicoll

Q.  How many Heisenbergs does it take to screw in a light bulb?
A.  If you know the number, you don't know where the light bulb is!