🚀 go-pugleaf

"Arthur Brain" <Arthur_Brain_1@hotmail.com> wrote in message

> > As far as I am aware the gays do not want amrriage so much as a
recognition
> > of their relationships in some legal manner.
>
> Then why do they insist they want "marriage"?

Why did minorities wish to be able to marry? Why did people who were in love
with people with other skin colours want to be able to marry?

> In Australia they have full recognition of their perverted
> partnerships, but they *still* want to play at husband and wife.

It's okay. You don't have to call others perverts to try to feel better
about thing's you done in the past which made you feel uncomfortable. As
long as you didn't do things like force yourself on anyone, or get involved
with minors while an adult, it's okay.

> > It becomes clear that it is a requirement as we all know only relatives
can
> > visit in hospitals, and if a gay couple have an accident the partner
might
> > be stopped from even comforting their partner because of being unable to
> > produce any legal attachment?
> > And I can understand that some legal recogition of the relationship so
that
> > if one dies, the money and/or  property wont go to an underserving aunt,
> > brother or parent leaving the partner destitute?
>
> You don't need to turn "marriage" in a circus to do that.

They legalized gay marriage in my country & it didn't affect my marriage at
all (nor anyone else's that I can see). No 'circus' type things happened.
Society hasn't collapsed. I'd say one would have to have a very shakey
marriage for something like allowing gay marriages to affect it any. In fact
the only people who seem to be affected seem to be some people who've had a
few homosexual encounters and who scream about the marriage law it in hopes
that that will keep others from finding out about the encounters they feel
guilty about.

Karl Johanson