🚀 go-pugleaf

"Arthur Brain" <Arthur_Brain_1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:f3125902.0410150633.76dc290@posting.google.com...
> "Jackeroo" <jackeroo@ronospamck.com> wrote in message
news:<i1Obd.26533$5O5.5289@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
>
> > Well just today it has become clear that there is a chromosome that
causes
> > gays.
>
> Wow, "just today", eh? How exciting!

Would be for you, sounds like you have trouble knowing what day it is,
nevermind what is going on. But I can back whatever I say with factual
reports.
Oh I might add just today is the first acquaitance I have had that there is
even discussion about a gay gene.
http://www.newscientist.com/news/print.jsp?id=ns99996519
Not being gay, or the near gay that cant get their minds of it, I dont give
a stuff one way or the other.

Just dont care how others satisfy their sexual cravings, just dont like to
see persecution and condemnation for practices as long as they are not as
perverted as the West family in England, or legal torture chambers in
countries like Israel  that like to claim similiarities with our western
democracies.
>
> > But the research indicates that the gene is connected with fecundity and
> > families of gay people , apparently the straight members, have the same
gene
> > which is the cause of the increased fecundity.
>
> Wow! A gene that makes some people gay and makes others breed a lot,
> eh?
>
> Wow! this kind of "knowledge" sounds like it is right up there with
> the "bible code" and other great intellectual achievements of that
> sort.
>
> > As far as I am aware the gays do not want amrriage so much as a
recognition
> > of their relationships in some legal manner.
>
> Then why do they insist they want "marriage"?

Poor fella, trying hard but way out of his depth. Wants to get back to the
brainwashing, but entertaining , simpsons etc.

The religious want to stop any kind of relationship so compare it with
marriage.
>
> In Australia they have full recognition of their perverted
> partnerships, but they *still* want to play at husband and wife.

As I understand in Australia the partnership  does not address the matters
below.
So I know it's straining your  attention span, but check it out.


>
> > It becomes clear that it is a requirement as we all know only relatives
can
> > visit in hospitals, and if a gay couple have an accident the partner
might
> > be stopped from even comforting their partner because of being unable to
> > produce any legal attachment?
> > And I can understand that some legal recogition of the relationship so
that
> > if one dies, the money and/or  property wont go to an underserving aunt,
> > brother or parent leaving the partner destitute?
>
> You don't need to turn "marriage" in a circus to do that.

You're not to bright are you, yes marriage gives heterosexual partners all
those things in one hit, so as I understand it  partnerships and complex
arrangements have to be made to ensure the same rights for gay couples.

And I would lie to see that so that the matter is taken out of the political
arena, where matters of class induced funding, illegal wars, HTA agreements,
PBS can no longer be  submerged by what gays are doing.