🚀 go-pugleaf

"DavidW" <no@email.provided> wrote ...
> |-|ercules wrote:
>> "DavidW" <no@email.provided> wrote
>>>> -|ercules wrote:
>>>> "DavidW" <no@email.provided> wrote...
>>>>>> -|ercules wrote:
>>>>>> As Sylvia is the only person to come up with genuine questions
>>>>>> to test my psychic dominance, I offer her this challenge.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Shuffle your original 6 cosmology questions and post the MD5
>>>>>> of the file with a private keyword appended so I can't decrypt it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Read out the first question while filling out the first page at
>>>>>> www.HercsHome.com/AskPsychic.html
>>>>>
>>>>> What are the page and line number entries about?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So I can lookup the answer using bibliomancy, without knowing the
>>>> question.
>>>
>>> But if the subject being mind-read enters those, doesn't that imply
>>> that the page and line no. must match the answer, in which case the
>>> subject has pretty remarkable powers as well? What if my answer is
>>> no but I give a page and line no. for yes?
>>
>>
>> No, it's exactly the same a a tarot reader giving you the deck to
>> shuffle and the tarot reader interprets the deck.
>>
>> Although the answer is determined in my case.
>>
>> If you look up the page number yourself it won't work, only through
>> me.
> 
> Is there anything for me to "look up"? You are asking for page and line nos., 
> but you don't say in what, or provide a link to anything, so all one can do is 
> dream up some numbers and plug them in.
> 
>> If you TELL ME what quote you looked up, that will work too.
> 
> Quote in what?

I'm using the bible, but it's better if you don't know what book since
you could rig a poor answer.


> 
>> If your answer is a set NO and you ask me for an answer then you
>> broke the TOS.
> 
> Okay, let me get this right:
> I think of a question, which must be one of the three questions I offer, and you 
> will answer that question by somehow using the page and line nos. I enter. Are 
> you saying that I am barred from asking a question that has only one possible 
> answer, or a question to which I know the answer?

It's a yes / no question, I look at the bible quote which will be God telling me
something about your question or an answer.

I work backwards to tell you exactly what your question was because skeptics
are too docile to score a subjective answer.


> 
> In any case, you have a 1/2 chance of getting the right answer, which is not 
> unlikely enough to attribute a correct answer to mind reading.


Your stats escape me.  I can do it more than once BTW.

Have you seen the new www.MINDREADING.com site?


Herc
--
www.MINDREADING.com