🚀 go-pugleaf

|-|ercules wrote:
> "DavidW" <no@email.provided> wrote ...
>>> -|ercules wrote:
>>> "DavidW" <no@email.provided> wrote
>>
>>> If your answer is a set NO and you ask me for an answer then you
>>> broke the TOS.
>>
>> Okay, let me get this right:
>> I think of a question, which must be one of the three questions I
>> offer, and you will answer that question by somehow using the page
>> and line nos. I enter. Are you saying that I am barred from asking a
>> question that has only one possible answer, or a question to which I
>> know the answer?
>
> It's a yes / no question, I look at the bible quote which will be God
> telling me something about your question or an answer.

You haven't cleared up the apparent restrictions with the question. Above you 
imply that it can't be one with a "set" answer, which appears to rule out any 
question I know the answer to.

> I work backwards to tell you exactly what your question was because
> skeptics are too docile to score a subjective answer.
>
>
>>
>> In any case, you have a 1/2 chance of getting the right answer,
>> which is not unlikely enough to attribute a correct answer to mind
>> reading.
>
>
> Your stats escape me.

If all you are doing is giving me the answer (Your site says "Before I attempt 
to answer your question I must read your mind what it is!"), then you have a 1/2 
chance of getting it right (Heads for Yes/Tails for No). There's nothing there 
about determining the question also. Is that a service commitment or just a 
bonus ?

> I can do it more than once BTW.
>
> Have you seen the new www.MINDREADING.com site?

Yes, that's where your link takes me. Isn't that what we've been discussing?

P.S. My Usenet server limits cross-posting to three other groups. That's why I'm 
deleting some of the groups you've added.