🚀 go-pugleaf

"DavidW" <no@email.provided> wrote...
> |-|ercules wrote:
>> "DavidW" <no@email.provided> wrote
>>>> -|ercules wrote:
>>>> "DavidW" <no@email.provided> wrote ...
>>>>>> -|ercules wrote:
>>>>>> "DavidW" <no@email.provided> wrote
>>>>>
>>>>>> If your answer is a set NO and you ask me for an answer then you
>>>>>> broke the TOS.
>>>>>
>>>>> Okay, let me get this right:
>>>>> I think of a question, which must be one of the three questions I
>>>>> offer, and you will answer that question by somehow using the page
>>>>> and line nos. I enter. Are you saying that I am barred from asking
>>>>> a question that has only one possible answer, or a question to
>>>>> which I know the answer?
>>>>
>>>> It's a yes / no question, I look at the bible quote which will be
>>>> God telling me something about your question or an answer.
>>>
>>> You haven't cleared up the apparent restrictions with the question.
>>> Above you imply that it can't be one with a "set" answer, which
>>> appears to rule out any question I know the answer to.
>>>
>>>> I work backwards to tell you exactly what your question was because
>>>> skeptics are too docile to score a subjective answer.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In any case, you have a 1/2 chance of getting the right answer,
>>>>> which is not unlikely enough to attribute a correct answer to mind
>>>>> reading.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Your stats escape me.
>>>
>>> If all you are doing is giving me the answer (Your site says "Before
>>> I attempt to answer your question I must read your mind what it
>>> is!"), then you have a 1/2 chance of getting it right (Heads for
>>> Yes/Tails for No). There's nothing there about determining the
>>> question also. Is that a service commitment or just a bonus ?
>>>
>>>> I can do it more than once BTW.
>>>>
>>>> Have you seen the new www.MINDREADING.com site?
>>>
>>> Yes, that's where your link takes me. Isn't that what we've been
>>> discussing? P.S. My Usenet server limits cross-posting to three other groups.
>>> That's why I'm deleting some of the groups you've added.
>>
>>
>> 1/ read the terms check box
> 
> I have read the terms and I agree with them.
> 
>> 2/ Guessing from 3 options is 3:1
> 
> Assuming that you are identifying the question. The site only claims to give the 
> correct answer, which is a 1/2 chance.
> 
>> Please think carefully before bombarding me with objections to a
>> trivial website form.
> 
> These are not objections. I am trying to thoroughly understand what you are 
> claiming to be able to do and what restrictions on my questions exist (if any).
> 
> How about I just give you my questions.
> 
> At afternoon tea time, do I usually drink a cup of:
> 1. Coffee?
> 2. Hot chocolate?
> 3. Tea?
> 
> One of those is the question I would like the answer to.
> 
> Page: 642
> Line: 71


huh?  I've explained over 200 times - a question you want to find out the answer to.

Do any of you comprehend English?

Here's your response.

<< Praise the Lord.  Praise the Lord>>

I can NOT determine what your question was you were thinking of because
you already know the answer.

Yes, call me names, call me fail, call me copout, just do anything other
than follow the simple rules.

Herc