🚀 go-pugleaf

On 5/07/2012 5:21 PM, Graham Cooper wrote:
> On Jul 5, 3:31 pm, Sylvia Else <syl...@not.here.invalid> wrote:
>> On 5/07/2012 3:09 PM, Graham Cooper wrote:
>>
>>> On Jul 5, 2:16 pm, Sylvia Else <syl...@not.here.invalid> wrote:
>>>> On 5/07/2012 1:22 PM, Graham Cooper wrote:
>>
>>>>> On Jul 5, 10:04 am, Sylvia Else <syl...@not.here.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/07/2012 9:07 AM, Graham Cooper wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> AUSTRALIA IS AMERICA'S TEST SAND PIT for new Totalitarian
>>>>>>> Legislastion, in Wikipedia Australia is listed as the 1st example of
>>>>>>> IMPRISON WITHOUT CHARGE LAWS.
>>
>>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remand_(detention)
>>
>>>>>> The word Australia does not appear on that page at all.
>>
>>>>>> Sylvia.
>>
>>>>> you really can't find it from that Wiki link ABOUT imprison without
>>>>> charge countries?
>>
>>>> Why would you post a link to one page while talking about the content of
>>>> another?
>>
>>>> If the page you're talking about actually exists, then post a link to it.
>>
>>>> Sylvia.
>>
>>> The link given is about prison without charge laws.
>>
>>> If you're not interested in the topic enough to look it up then you
>>> are just trolling.
>>
>>> Here's a start!
>>
>>>>>>> IMPRISON WITHOUT CHARGE LAWS.
>>
>>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remand_(detention)
>>
>> As I said, the word Australia does not appear there.  It's far from
>> clear what point you're trying to make.
>>
>> Sylvia.
>
>
>
> WHAT IS YOUR POINT?
>
> I explained the link 3 times now
>
> You're only contribution to this thread is evidence you have a brain
> slug on you turning you into a drivelling idiot
>
> I'm not going to FETCH A LINK FOR YOU FFS

Why not? You're the one referring to it. You're the one who apparently 
wanted to make some point either about it, or supported by it.

Sylvia.