🚀 go-pugleaf

On Mar 10, 9:49 am, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 03/09/2013 03:59 PM, Graham Cooper wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 10, 7:48 am, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 03/09/2013 01:33 PM, Graham Cooper wrote:
>
> >>> On Mar 9, 12:32 pm, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> On 03/08/2013 05:52 PM, Graham Cooper wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> and has been GOING ON THESE PERPETUAL D.O.S. TANGENTS TOPICS
>
> >>>>>>> for 3 years EVER SINCE HE WAS THE FIRST SKEPTIC TO EVER LOSE TO A
> >>>>>>> MINDREADER!!
>
> >>>>>>> BOO YEH!
>
> >>>>>> And yet, I *have* put my money where my mouth is, several times, and you
> >>>>>> keep refusing even though there's no risk to you.  I keep giving you the
> >>>>>> opportunity to prove your abilities, and you (knowing as well as we do
>
> >>>>> Yes yes Brucey Boy!
>
> >>>>> I call this a DENIAL OF SERVICE  argument.
>
> >>>>> You keep bombarding me with 50 Trillion To 1 blind tests for a tasty
> >>>>> $5 morsel!
>
> >>>> Actually, it's a $1,024 "morsel"---more than the amount you owe Brad.
> >>>> All with no financial risk to you.
>
> >>>>> -----------------------
>
> >>>>> SAME DOS diversion tactics by ALL people who then use it against me.
>
> >>>>> Skeptics are particular prone to use this tactic, keep asking a never
> >>>>> ending string of Questions, there is no reasonable test, and no prize
> >>>>> money ever to be offered!
>
> >>>> I just described and offered a very reasonable test.  I'd state it
> >>>> again, but anyone who cares can simply look upthread for it.
>
> >>>>> Same with the Ray White receptionist, keeps asking and asking for more
> >>>>> pay slips and proof of income then has me arrested when I mention I
> >>>>> work with CAMGIRLS.com
>
> >>>> No, that wasn't about you "working" with camgirls (who have nothing to
> >>>> do with you and probably never will), but rather with her assessment
> >>>> that you have no income.
>
> >>>>> Same with CHANNEL 9 LAWYER when I tried to sue for defamation.  Keeps
> >>>>> asking me again and again and again for CAUSE OF ACTION, never
> >>>>> responds to a single word I say, just blind DOS tactics until they
> >>>>> take you court.
>
> >>>> Now you're just babbling.
>
> >>>>> Same with CSICOP, asks me for more and more and  more and more details
> >>>>> on the DEMO until they ditch you.
>
> >>>> I don't even know what you're babbling about now.
>
> >>>>> STANDARD TACTICS BRUCES - KEEP ON AND KEEP ON ASKING ME THIS AND
> >>>>> OFFERING THAT
>
> >>>>> ALL THE TIME - 3 YEARS NOW YOU'VE DISTRACTED AND DETERRED A 2nd
> >>>>> MINDREADING TEST.
>
> >>>> I'm *offering* another test, just as I've done many times before.
>
> >>>>> One has to wonder why you've taken it upon yourself to go to these
> >>>>> extremes (OVER 3 YEARS) to never let me mindread another person??
>
> >>>> You didn't even *try* to come up with an excuse this time!  OK, let's
> >>>> sweeten the pot a little.  Instead of the $1024 prize for getting 20 of
> >>>> 20 right, I'll drop the odds a bit.  Instead of 20 questions, we'll just
> >>>> have 10.  Get just *half* of them right (that's 5 for
> >>>> arithmetically-challenged folks), and I'll pay you $1.  Then I'll
> >>>> *quadruple* it for every extra one you get right.  That's right, get 6
> >>>> right, and you get $4, 7 right gets you $16, 8 right gets you $64, 9
> >>>> right gets you $256, and getting all 10 right gets you $1024!  Are you
> >>>> really going to snub your nose at the chance to both prove your
> >>>> abilities *and* to make a little better than a grand?  How long does it
> >>>> take for you to make that much money on your public assistance?  And no
> >>>> risk!
>
> >>>> Oh, and of course, I have not done anything to prevent anyone else from
> >>>> participating in your tests.  That's just your paranoia speaking.  Even
> >>>> though I have seven times as much magic power as you have, it isn't
> >>>> enough to force other people to avoid you.  That's all down to you.
>
> >>>> I guess it's fair enough to wonder why I do this.  On the one hand, I
> >>>> know that you'll never agree to a reasonable test.  Even if you did
> >>>> (which would amaze everyone *far* more than your cloud pics do), you'd
> >>>> fail that test.  On the other hand, I retain enough open-mindedness to
> >>>> be willing to be convinced, even after you've shown yourself a deluded
> >>>> loon so many times in the past.
>
> >>> I have a Test.
>
> >>> a VERY SIMPLE TEST
>
> >>> It proves Paranormal reasonably quickly though it takes a while to get
> >>> rolling.
>
> >>> You Think Of A Word
> >>> You Tell me a random Page Number
> >>> I Describe Your Word using Bibliomancy   (TELEPATHY)
> >>> After 3 goes - I guess all 3 words   (OBJECTIVE)
>
> >> And if my word is "toboggan", but you come up with "sushi", you claim
> >> that's close enough, because sushi has a connection to tofu, which
> >> starts with the same two letters.  No, I don't think so.  Of course, we
> >> also know you'll change the rules, so it will be something like the one
> >> where you guess the *order* of the words, and not the words themselves.
> >>    That way, you have as much chance of getting it right by random chance
> >> as if you were guessing a roll of a single six-sided die.
>
> >> On the very off chance that you're serious, and believe you can actually
> >> guess what the three words are (not just the order), then say what the
> >> supposed "bet" is.  What happens if you don't exactly match any of the
> >> three, what if you get one, what if you get two, and what if you get all
> >> three?  And is this another where you have to have a day between each
> >> post, and where you throw a tantrum if anyone on Usenet posts anything
> >> else while it's going on?
>
> >>> There is a Small Wager because working out 1,000,000:1 contracts has
> >>> stalled any observations for 10 years now!
>
> >> You haven't even said what the "small wager" is on this latest test.  It
> >> doesn't really matter, since we all know you'd back out of it anyway, if
> >> anyone took you up on it.  Just like you backed out of paying Brad the
> >> $1000 you promised.
>
> >>> NO TAKERS!    FINE!   YOU CAN ALL GO TO HELL!
>
> >>> I MAKE EDEN ANYWAY!   I USE ALL GODS POWER ALL ON MY OWN FAMILY.   YOU
> >>> ALL LIVE LIKE MONKEYS FOR LIFE.
>
> >> Your idea of Eden is living all by yourself, in squalor, with the
> >> constant threat of police action against you?  OK, if that's what you
> >> want, I guess you can keep it.
>
> >>> OWNER OF THE $100 MILLION WEBSITE WWW.CAMGIRLS.COM
>
> >> No, you aren't.  I don't know why you persist in this patently false
> >> claim.  Why don't you claim to be the sole owner of Microsoft instead?
> >> As long as you're going to lie, lie big!
>
> >> So it all comes down to your refusing to take a test that has a real
> >> chance of demonstrating your claimed powers, at no risk to you and with
> >> a substantial money prize.  That's just what I predicted would happen.
> >> I'll even change the above test from being questions to being words.
> >> I'll come up with 10 words instead of 10 questions, and leave the rest
> >> of the test as is.  You just have to guess what the order of the ten
> >> words is, and if you're right, you make over a thousand dollars---a
> >> princely sum to an impoverished ward of the state such as yourself.
>
> > YOU'VE DESIGNED 20 TESTS BRUCE
>
> > AND THEY ARE ALL SHIT!
>
> By which you mean that they would effectively weed out random noise, and
> only demonstrate extraordinary ability.  My tests would require someone
> to have some sort of magic power (or be incredibly lucky) to win.  Your
> tests just require an ordinary amount of luck, and no magic powers.
> Guess which ones are more likely to impress people as evidence of you
> having magic powers?
>
> > LISTEN!  ITS THIS EASY!
>
> Yes, your tests are easy to "win" by luck.  We get that.
>
> > PARABET 1.0
>
> > YOU THINK OF A WORD
> > I DESCRIBE IT
> > REPEAT 3 TIMES
>
> > SHUFFLE 3 WORDS
>
> > I PUT THEM IN ORDER
>
> Ah, so it's just like I thought; you're making up new rules as you go
> along.  Just above, you claimed you'd be able to guess the words.  Now
> you're back to just guessing which of 6 possible orders they're in.  You
> went from an incredible long shot to a single die throw in one fell
> swoop.  This is just a rehash of the test you failed with Brad.  We've
> already seen you fail this test spectacularly.  Why would anyone be
> interested in watching you fail it again?
>
> > HOW THE FUCK SOMEONE COULD BE SO STUPID
>
> > TO CALL THAT SUBJECTIVE
>
> > AND THEN MAKE HIS OWN TESTS
>
> > IS BEYOND STUPIDITY!
>
> I realize that your mental illness renders you less capable of
> understanding how people could be less than impressed with your claim of
> sometimes being able to do a single die throw in the course of a week,
> but try to concentrate, and you'll get it eventually.
>
> > FUCK OFF BRUCE
>
> > YOU'RE THE BIGGEST STUPID IDIOT I'VE EVER FUCKING MET
>
> You seem confused, which is not surprising.  You have never met me.  In
> fact, I doubt you've ever been on the same continent with me.  Would you
> like me to send you a nice, relaxing picture of some clouds?
>
> Oh, and for the record, I'm really not very big.  I'm sure you've met
> plenty of people bigger than I am.  Then again, the fact that you've
> resorted to an all-caps psychotic break indicates that your views are
> unlikely to be at all rational.
>


Look you moron!


I'VE OFFERED THE SAME 1 TEST FOR 5 MONTHS!

PARABET 1.0


I GUESS WHAT WORD YOU WERE THINKING

1ST OF ALL SUBJECTIVELY

THEN I MAKE A 1 IN 3 OPTIONS GUESS.


----------------

You can't even get that far!


All your tests are SHIT!

YOU DESIGN THEM AROUND Things I've said DONT WORK!

---

LOOK!

ITS THE SAME AS A ZENNER TEST

---

YOU HAVE 3 SHEETS OF CARDBOARD!

(I'M SPEAKING METAPHORICALLY HERE)

----

DO *NOT* SPEND 6 MONTHS TELLING ME ABOUT CARDBOARD!

----

YOU WRITE

"GOD"   on 1 sheet

YOU WRITE

"HOUSE"  on sheet 2

YOU WRITE

"BIRD"  on sheet 3

----

You KEEP THE WORD TO YOUSELF

----

YOU HOLD UP THE BACK OF THE CARD TO ME

(I'M SPEAKING METAPHORICALLY AGAIN)

DO NOT SPEND 6 MONTHS LECTURING ME ABOUT HOLDING UP CARDBOARD!

-----


I DESCRIBE EACH CARDBOARD  BLIND!

-----

THEN YOU SHUFFLE THE 3 CARDS AND SHOW THEM TO ME


-----

I SAY

THE 1ST CARD WAS BIRD
THE 2ND CARD WAS  HOUSE
THE 3RD CARD WAS GO

-----

ITS AS SIMPLE AS FUCKING POSSIBLE

ITS THE ONLY TEST I EVER MENTION

FFS!

Herc