Article View: sci.skeptic
Article #5399Re: FOX: Epic Christian Revival
From: Graham Cooper
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 22:59
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 22:59
217 lines
9874 bytes
9874 bytes
On Mar 10, 7:48 am, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote: > On 03/09/2013 01:33 PM, Graham Cooper wrote: > > > > On Mar 9, 12:32 pm, BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> On 03/08/2013 05:52 PM, Graham Cooper wrote: > > >>>>> and has been GOING ON THESE PERPETUAL D.O.S. TANGENTS TOPICS > > >>>>> for 3 years EVER SINCE HE WAS THE FIRST SKEPTIC TO EVER LOSE TO A > >>>>> MINDREADER!! > > >>>>> BOO YEH! > > >>>> And yet, I *have* put my money where my mouth is, several times, and you > >>>> keep refusing even though there's no risk to you. I keep giving you the > >>>> opportunity to prove your abilities, and you (knowing as well as we do > > >>> Yes yes Brucey Boy! > > >>> I call this a DENIAL OF SERVICE argument. > > >>> You keep bombarding me with 50 Trillion To 1 blind tests for a tasty > >>> $5 morsel! > > >> Actually, it's a $1,024 "morsel"---more than the amount you owe Brad. > >> All with no financial risk to you. > > >>> ----------------------- > > >>> SAME DOS diversion tactics by ALL people who then use it against me. > > >>> Skeptics are particular prone to use this tactic, keep asking a never > >>> ending string of Questions, there is no reasonable test, and no prize > >>> money ever to be offered! > > >> I just described and offered a very reasonable test. I'd state it > >> again, but anyone who cares can simply look upthread for it. > > >>> Same with the Ray White receptionist, keeps asking and asking for more > >>> pay slips and proof of income then has me arrested when I mention I > >>> work with CAMGIRLS.com > > >> No, that wasn't about you "working" with camgirls (who have nothing to > >> do with you and probably never will), but rather with her assessment > >> that you have no income. > > >>> Same with CHANNEL 9 LAWYER when I tried to sue for defamation. Keeps > >>> asking me again and again and again for CAUSE OF ACTION, never > >>> responds to a single word I say, just blind DOS tactics until they > >>> take you court. > > >> Now you're just babbling. > > >>> Same with CSICOP, asks me for more and more and more and more details > >>> on the DEMO until they ditch you. > > >> I don't even know what you're babbling about now. > > >>> STANDARD TACTICS BRUCES - KEEP ON AND KEEP ON ASKING ME THIS AND > >>> OFFERING THAT > > >>> ALL THE TIME - 3 YEARS NOW YOU'VE DISTRACTED AND DETERRED A 2nd > >>> MINDREADING TEST. > > >> I'm *offering* another test, just as I've done many times before. > > >>> One has to wonder why you've taken it upon yourself to go to these > >>> extremes (OVER 3 YEARS) to never let me mindread another person?? > > >> You didn't even *try* to come up with an excuse this time! OK, let's > >> sweeten the pot a little. Instead of the $1024 prize for getting 20 of > >> 20 right, I'll drop the odds a bit. Instead of 20 questions, we'll just > >> have 10. Get just *half* of them right (that's 5 for > >> arithmetically-challenged folks), and I'll pay you $1. Then I'll > >> *quadruple* it for every extra one you get right. That's right, get 6 > >> right, and you get $4, 7 right gets you $16, 8 right gets you $64, 9 > >> right gets you $256, and getting all 10 right gets you $1024! Are you > >> really going to snub your nose at the chance to both prove your > >> abilities *and* to make a little better than a grand? How long does it > >> take for you to make that much money on your public assistance? And no > >> risk! > > >> Oh, and of course, I have not done anything to prevent anyone else from > >> participating in your tests. That's just your paranoia speaking. Even > >> though I have seven times as much magic power as you have, it isn't > >> enough to force other people to avoid you. That's all down to you. > > >> I guess it's fair enough to wonder why I do this. On the one hand, I > >> know that you'll never agree to a reasonable test. Even if you did > >> (which would amaze everyone *far* more than your cloud pics do), you'd > >> fail that test. On the other hand, I retain enough open-mindedness to > >> be willing to be convinced, even after you've shown yourself a deluded > >> loon so many times in the past. > > > I have a Test. > > > a VERY SIMPLE TEST > > > It proves Paranormal reasonably quickly though it takes a while to get > > rolling. > > > You Think Of A Word > > You Tell me a random Page Number > > I Describe Your Word using Bibliomancy (TELEPATHY) > > After 3 goes - I guess all 3 words (OBJECTIVE) > > And if my word is "toboggan", but you come up with "sushi", you claim > that's close enough, because sushi has a connection to tofu, which > starts with the same two letters. No, I don't think so. Of course, we > also know you'll change the rules, so it will be something like the one > where you guess the *order* of the words, and not the words themselves. > That way, you have as much chance of getting it right by random chance > as if you were guessing a roll of a single six-sided die. > > On the very off chance that you're serious, and believe you can actually > guess what the three words are (not just the order), then say what the > supposed "bet" is. What happens if you don't exactly match any of the > three, what if you get one, what if you get two, and what if you get all > three? And is this another where you have to have a day between each > post, and where you throw a tantrum if anyone on Usenet posts anything > else while it's going on? > > > There is a Small Wager because working out 1,000,000:1 contracts has > > stalled any observations for 10 years now! > > You haven't even said what the "small wager" is on this latest test. It > doesn't really matter, since we all know you'd back out of it anyway, if > anyone took you up on it. Just like you backed out of paying Brad the > $1000 you promised. > > > NO TAKERS! FINE! YOU CAN ALL GO TO HELL! > > > I MAKE EDEN ANYWAY! I USE ALL GODS POWER ALL ON MY OWN FAMILY. YOU > > ALL LIVE LIKE MONKEYS FOR LIFE. > > Your idea of Eden is living all by yourself, in squalor, with the > constant threat of police action against you? OK, if that's what you > want, I guess you can keep it. > > > OWNER OF THE $100 MILLION WEBSITE WWW.CAMGIRLS.COM > > No, you aren't. I don't know why you persist in this patently false > claim. Why don't you claim to be the sole owner of Microsoft instead? > As long as you're going to lie, lie big! > > So it all comes down to your refusing to take a test that has a real > chance of demonstrating your claimed powers, at no risk to you and with > a substantial money prize. That's just what I predicted would happen. > I'll even change the above test from being questions to being words. > I'll come up with 10 words instead of 10 questions, and leave the rest > of the test as is. You just have to guess what the order of the ten > words is, and if you're right, you make over a thousand dollars---a > princely sum to an impoverished ward of the state such as yourself. > YOU'VE DESIGNED 20 TESTS BRUCE AND THEY ARE ALL SHIT! LISTEN! ITS THIS EASY! PARABET 1.0 YOU THINK OF A WORD I DESCRIBE IT REPEAT 3 TIMES SHUFFLE 3 WORDS I PUT THEM IN ORDER ------ HOW THE FUCK SOMEONE COULD BE SO STUPID TO CALL THAT SUBJECTIVE AND THEN MAKE HIS OWN TESTS IS BEYOND STUPIDITY! ------ FUCK OFF BRUCE YOU'RE THE BIGGEST STUPID IDIOT I'VE EVER FUCKING MET Herc
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<f2152b1c-b57c-40b1-b70d-9ee0aff738e3@vv8g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!o5ni265qas.0!nntp.google.com!dd2no273212qab.0!postnews.google.com!vv8g2000pbc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<f8693035-51df-4202-b25e-8c37027ab7ce@7g2000yqy.googlegroups.com> <aed36272-3aaa-42eb-815e-b535a6ac1d50@q9g2000pbf.googlegroups.com> <kh3b9a$hbr$1@dont-email.me> <c23e91ad-2974-44d8-bf88-e52126f6b23f@ru10g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <kh600u$q42$1@dont-email.me> <1711ddb4-98e7-4d06-98f5-2f7e37c5e741@iq8g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <kh8cne$n53$1@dont-email.me> <636fac19-86bf-494b-956f-2a6a8429d8ef@hd10g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <khan4d$v09$1@dont-email.me> <0c63b2da-922b-408c-bbb5-8812d343e288@la7g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <khbcvu$qvc$1@dont-email.me> <fffd57df-ce65-4552-808e-ec1c6d3f6c81@pl9g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <khd3sg$i24$1@dont-email.me> <fdba92a5-75e0-4a35-a649-baea158f1269@iq8g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <khe6t7$8jv$1@dont-email.me> <f675c1c3-08a1-4f7c-84ff-c53fcfa97971@rq16g2000pbb.googlegroups.com> <khgak3$csf$1@dont-email.me>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 3b9c5691a5,7ddfbffb66d9f819
X-Google-Attributes: gid3b9c5691a5,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Received: by 10.224.18.132 with SMTP id w4mr5040087qaa.1.1362869995215;
Sat, 09 Mar 2013 14:59:55 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.12.227 with SMTP id b3mr373645igc.13.1362869995015; Sat,
09 Mar 2013 14:59:55 -0800 (PST)
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!o5ni265qas.0!nntp.google.com!dd2no273212qab.0!postnews.google.com!vv8g2000pbc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.skeptic,alt.atheism,aus.tv,alt.talk.creationism,rec.org.mensa
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2013 14:59:54 -0800 (PST)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: vv8g2000pbc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=101.168.42.167; posting-account=EsDGawkAAAAN6xcF2fi-X0yb3ECD-3_I
NNTP-Posting-Host: 101.168.42.167
References: <f8693035-51df-4202-b25e-8c37027ab7ce@7g2000yqy.googlegroups.com>
<aed36272-3aaa-42eb-815e-b535a6ac1d50@q9g2000pbf.googlegroups.com>
<kh3b9a$hbr$1@dont-email.me> <c23e91ad-2974-44d8-bf88-e52126f6b23f@ru10g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
<kh600u$q42$1@dont-email.me> <1711ddb4-98e7-4d06-98f5-2f7e37c5e741@iq8g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
<kh8cne$n53$1@dont-email.me> <636fac19-86bf-494b-956f-2a6a8429d8ef@hd10g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
<khan4d$v09$1@dont-email.me> <0c63b2da-922b-408c-bbb5-8812d343e288@la7g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
<khbcvu$qvc$1@dont-email.me> <fffd57df-ce65-4552-808e-ec1c6d3f6c81@pl9g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
<khd3sg$i24$1@dont-email.me> <fdba92a5-75e0-4a35-a649-baea158f1269@iq8g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
<khe6t7$8jv$1@dont-email.me> <f675c1c3-08a1-4f7c-84ff-c53fcfa97971@rq16g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>
<khgak3$csf$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like
Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.152 Safari/537.22,gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <f2152b1c-b57c-40b1-b70d-9ee0aff738e3@vv8g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: FOX: Epic Christian Revival
From: Graham Cooper <grahamcooper7@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 22:59:55 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable