🚀 go-pugleaf

On 01/13/2013 05:36 PM, Graham Cooper wrote:
> On Jan 14, 10:01 am, "Clocky" <notg...@happen.com> wrote:
>> Graham Cooper wrote:
>>> On Jan 14, 6:25 am, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Jan 14, 6:20 am, Mike Duffy <Use.web.form@website_in_sig.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>
>>>>> BruceS <bruce...@hotmail.com> wrote
>>>>> innews:kcv435$3hd$3@dont-email.me:
>>
>>>>>> Yes, please. I'm not forgetting a step, am I? AIUI, you reveal the
>>>>>> list (in a random order),
>>
>>>>> I reply with my guess at the original order
>>
>>>>>> (ostensibly using my channels to guide me) and you then grade my
>>>>>> guess.
>>
>>>>> The problem is that my original word list is in lexicographic order.
>>
>>>>> Given that this is the most obvious ordering, I cannot see how to
>>>>> proceed. Eventually, it would need to be revealed.
>>
>>>>> Do you want a new list? And do you need the numbers? What do you do
>>>>> with them?
>>
>>>> Just give Bruce 5 words see how he does!
>>
>>>> He knows the alphabetical order so he has roughly 50:50 of matching
>>>> each word, bit less!
>>
>>>> Herc
>>
>>> BRUCE if you can guess all 5 words in their right spot I'll paypal you
>>> $5!
>>
>>> That's a TRILLION, TRILLION, TRILLION TIMES better ODDS
>>> than you offered to me!   Lol
>>
>>> Herc
>>
>> You bailed on another test and you still owe Brad $1000 for quitting the
>> last one.

Yes, so there's no point in my trusting him to do *anything* like pay 
out money as promised.  He's not only broke, he's also a lying fraud.

> Brad started a Hate Thread during the test and his witness posted
> clues.

Always the excuses with you, using imaginary events.

> He had 2 Word 1s
>
> He said he was not betting any money.

No, he said he thought his money was safe, as we all knew you couldn't 
succeed.

> He added to the protocol.

No, *you* added to the protocol.  He just followed it to the letter, and 
worked well within the poorly-defined boundaries you'd set.

> This repeated claim of Skeptics Victory is typical of the truth
> challenged yobbos in it for the biggotry, not the science!

We aren't even proud of "victory", as it's really more a matter of your 
continued, and completely predictable failures.  Calling any of this 
"skeptics victory" would be like getting excited that we could drive a 
car around a track faster than the Special Olympics 400M dash.  The 
difference is, those people are honest about their abilities.