🚀 go-pugleaf

On May 2, 7:15 am, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 1, 10:33 pm, Brad <goog...@vk2qq.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 1, 10:12 pm, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On May 1, 9:44 pm, Brad <goog...@vk2qq.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On May 1, 8:49 pm, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On May 1, 8:21 pm, Peter Bowditch <myfirstn...@ratbags.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >then a few more subjective goes, don't know if it's working good
> > > > > > >enough yet to proceed to the guessing stage.
>
> > > > > > What? You want "subjective goes", but you haven't even started
> > > > > > guessing yet? Doesn't sound very psychic to me.
>
> > > > > Yep,  GUESSING is OBJECTIVE if you get them right!  ;)
>
> > > > > Brad's teleasking skill is yet to be confirmed.  He seems to be
> > > > > getting some paranormal channels going:
>
> > > > > BUCK - FRUIT
>
> > > > > His words were very closely tied to the channels.  But both channels
> > > > > were META-CHANNELS.
>
> > > > > CHANNEL 1 - BUCKED OFF HIS HORSE  ( Brad couldn't master doing a
> > > > > channel )
> > > > > CHANNEL 2 - MISSING CRITICAL ELEMENT  ( Brad forgot to use the POST
> > > > > TEMPLATE )
>
> > > > > These 2 channels seem quite Expected for someone like Brad and his
> > > > > lack of Positive Aptitude in conducting the test.
>
> > > > > If he changes tune and starts doing the protocol, remembering the post
> > > > > template, remembering the word, I think he'll make the biggest
> > > > > discovery in science of all time!
>
> > > > > Right here and right now!
>
> > > > > Until then, more subjective demos....
>
> > > > I'm still laughing over this one!!!!!-
>
> > > Well you have 2 hours left to laugh until the trial is void, and that
> > > will be it!
>
> > > Word 3?
>
> > I have told you that I have forgotten the word and we will have to
> > wait until Bruce can confirm it. That WAS the point of having a
> > witness, right? And what does it matter to you if the word expires?
> > You channeled the word Horse two days after it expired, and you did
> > that to my teleasked word POOL. And then you claimed it was
> > 'reasonable".
>
> > Don't forget - I'm not doing this to prove anything. YOU ARE
>
> it doesn't matter if the word is given before or after.
> I channeled "got bucked off and thrown to the ground" etc.
> just hours before Bruce gave the word HORSE.
>
> Now we have 'contaminated' Monday's word, unless we wait an extra 24
> hours after Word3 is given.
>
> You seriously don't have a sent items?
>
> I think this test is over, you couldn't post a simple template with a
> word substituted after a week of trying.

I used 'reply to author' in Google Groups to email Bruce, so No, I do
not have a 'sent items'.