🚀 go-pugleaf

"Mike Duffy" <respond@invalid.invalid> wrote in...
> "|-|ercules" <radgray123@yahoo.com> wrote in
> news:8jc71pF89lU1@mid.individual.net:
>
>> Essentially, God is putting the random numbers into your head, and
>> letting you think you selected them with your own free will.
>
> If this is the case, the how can *you* claim to have the gift of

I'm the son of God.  dah dah dut dut dut dut daaaaa



> bibliomancy? For example, suppose that I implemented the functionality
> of your web-site on my web-site. How would that generate different
> results than yours, other than the fact I automatically support
> translation via Google APIs into 53 spoken languages?

Same results if I view your TEST RECORDS.

"Everything" I see is coordinated to tie in together.

If I was not alive Bolt would be slow, Bill would not be a billionaire
and Woods would shoot 3 over par.


>
> Does God look at the IP number of the server to decide whether or not
> to let the mind of the user have free will? Would it make a difference
> if I copied the code from your server to mine, instead of re-
> engineering your requirements?
>
> Would your web-site continue to generate psychic predictions if you
> were to die?


unlikely.  but a global artificial intelligence might seed the 'thought search space' random branches
to influence the computers responses.



>
> And I have a few technical questions regarding your use of random
> numbers. Are you, in fact, using pseudo-random numbers? If so, are you
> re-seeding your generator using a deterministic or non-deterministic
> algorithm?

randomchapter1 = parseInt(Math.random()*chaps[parseInt(selectbook)]+1);
randomchapter2 = parseInt(Math.random()*chaps[parseInt(selectbook)]+1);
randomverse1 = parseInt(Math.random()*v[selectbook*1000 + randomchapter1]+1);
randomverse2 = parseInt(Math.random()*v[selectbook*1000 + randomchapter2]+1);


It's slightly skewed to select verses from smaller books and chapters.



>
> What if I were to download a large list of random values from the
> Fourmilab server, and just used those instead of picking values "at
> random" myself?
>

Probably, as long as you type in the numbers themselves it seems to work,
the drop down select list didn't work as it was just a random mouse movement.


Herc