🚀 go-pugleaf

<dev.null@example.com> wrote ...
> On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 09:51:07 +1000, "|-|ercules" <radgray123@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> 
>><dev.null@example.com> wrote ...
>>> On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 08:31:15 +1000, "|-|ercules" <radgray123@yahoo.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>><dev.null@example.com> wrote
>>>>> On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 05:59:02 +1000, "|-|ercules" <radgray123@yahoo.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>><dev.null@example.com> wrote ...
>>>>> 
>>>>> why did you snip the url?
>>>>> www.MINDREADING.com
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>>> That site is a lame con even for you. 1) think of a question and
>>>>>>> provide an MD5 for it. 2) Submit 3 questions including the original
>>>>>>> question. 3) Give me 24 hours to run MD5 on the 3 questions - must
>>>>>>> include the original question.  4) Now herc claims mind reading
>>>>>>> powers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The MD5 is only to be included in test results.  You can skip page 2 and
>>>>>>still test me out but it will only prove it to the telepathic asker, not publically.
>>>>> 
>>>>>>I assume you can backup your claim of cracking an MD5 in 24 hours
>>>>>>with a 15 digit numeric key appended to the question.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I assume that you have reading comprehension problems. Show me where I
>>>>> said I would crack an MD5.
>>>>> 
>>>>
>>>>So you're a skeptic but not a debunker?
>>>>
>>>>Standard debunker protocol, you duplicate my feat.
>>>>
>>>>If you think I can crack 15 digit keys then use 20 or 25 digits.  Or don't use MD5 at all,
>>>>keep your telepathically asked question all to yourself.
>>> 
>>> I don't think you are cracking anything. 
>>> 
>>>>There is no way I can cheat.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Herc
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> then why are you snippping out where I point out how you are cheating?
>>
>>
>>I didn't snip anything.  How can I cheat?
> 
> snipped by herc #1
> 1) think of a question and provide an MD5 for it.
> 2) Submit 3 questions including the original question.
> 
> you run MD5 on all 3 questions and now know the original question
> 
> 
> snipped by herc#2
> from mindreading.com
> "You must agree to the following {check box} I have included the
> original question in one of the above spaces"
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>I give the subjective answer to the question you think of, without any decision on my part,
>>I just look up the line number in the bible.
>>
>>Guessing the question is just a bonus to give an objective measure of the correlation,
>>because skeptics won't make any attempt to measure the accuracy of the answers.
>>
>>You think of a question, I answer it with a quote YOU TOLD ME TO LOOK UP.
>>
>>I can't cheat, because I don't actually have input on what I do.  I'm just the medium.
>>
>>
>>Herc 
> 
> apparently lies and evasions are your 'paranormal powers'
> as I've said come back when you are serious
> good day


You seriously think the trick behind MindReading.com is I put
all 3 questions into a MD5 calculator and my guess is the question
that matches the asker's MD5?


Herc