🚀 go-pugleaf

"Sylvia Else" <sylvia@not.here.invalid> wrote 
> On 1/10/2010 1:34 PM, |-|ercules wrote:
>> "Sylvia Else" <sylvia@not.here.invalid> wrote
>>> On 1/10/2010 3:46 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>> "Andy W" <vorath@mailinator.com> wrote ...
>>>>> On 30 Sep, 07:36, Peter Bowditch <myfirstn...@ratbags.com> wrote:
>>>>>> "|-|ercules" <radgray...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>You tell me 3 options, I tell you what option you were thinking of.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> Then when you get it wrong you demand that I prove what I was
>>>>>> thinking
>>>>>> >> of. Sorry, no cigar.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >Huh? That is just speculation and you just score me wrong anyway.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On what basis could I score you wrong unless I know what the correct
>>>>>> answer is?
>>>>>
>>>>> Herc is no longer claiming to be able to actually answer the question,
>>>>> just that he can guess which one you first thought of from a huge
>>>>> selection of three randomised choices. So if he picks your first
>>>>> question out of three, that is the right answer. It doesn't matter
>>>>> that he hasn't actually answered the question itself.
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course, the problem is still his caveat that the power only works
>>>>> properly if the asker was "genuinely interested" in knowing the answer
>>>>> to the question, because it means he can dismiss all the fail results
>>>>> as invalid due to no genuine interest,while keeping all the hits (no
>>>>> doubt even if they were also not of genuine interest). Of course he'll
>>>>> never drop that get-out clause because then he'd have to face a proper
>>>>> test of his powers which he'll inevitably fail.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, I am wondering if a good mentalist magician could achieve the
>>>>> same effect by simply examining the questions? That would basically
>>>>> render the whole test worthless.
>>>>>
>>>>> Andy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Utter fricking bullshit.
>>>>
>>>> To count as a valid result I have to dismiss the obviously poorly worded
>>>> questions
>>>> beforehand.
>>>
>>> Are you now willing to say that you will
>>>
>>> a) Perform the test on Usenet, so that all trials are visible,
>>>
>>> b) not attempt to respond to a trial before an MD5 hash for the
>>> proposed correct answer has been posted,
>>>
>>> c) either accept or reject a trial before posting your reponse,
>>>
>>> d) include ALL results for accepted trials, provided only that the
>>> posted MD5 matches one of the 3 questions (with due allowance for the
>>> secret key that prevents you from doing a search), with NO OTHER
>>> EXCEPTIONS,
>>>
>>> e) not even consider arguing that such a result should not be included
>>> on some basis,
>>>
>>> f) promise that if you fail to achieve an aggreed success rate over
>>> some agreed number of trials, you will once and for all abandon your
>>> attempts to get people to test you for this or any other paranormal
>>> power,
>>>
>>> g) cease to accuse anyone, skeptic or otherwise, of dishonesty,
>>> criminality or any like conduct, in their attitude towards testing
>>> you, and
>>>
>>> h) not attempt to avoid the requirements above on any basis whatsoever?
>>>
>>> Sylvia.
>>
>> why? to get you to ask a question? You have given me TOS and no service.
> 
> Getting input data that will produce results that will be believed seems 
> to be the problem you're having. I'm willing to provide that input data, 
> but only on the above terms.


No, skeptics won't cooperate is no longer a problem.  I'll just preach to the converted instead!

You've backflipped 3 times and so has Peter with his "we'll consider a test
if you yadayada" then he refuses to discuss any protocol and dismisses it
with some general denial he's heard off you.

Your questions would be a good run for my dark matter book is all.


> 
>>
>> When I'm back home I'll put a couple $$$ per week into google adwords,
>> psychic
>> traffic is only 1c a click and open minded people are not dickheads
>> trying to thwart
>> an experiment like all of you.
>>
>> If I can turn away questions, then using my online form at
>> www.MINDREADING.com
>> is sufficient to accept questions as nobody can follow simple
>> instructions on usenet.
>>
>> I'll post the good questions in <<MIND READING>> RESULTS OCTOBER and I
>> have added an MD5 field.
>>
>> Check that October thread, the data is very systematic.
>>
>> Check out the new page 2 of the site (just type in 1 field on page 1 and
>> you can click through the 4 pages of forms). It's has the famous DO NOT
>> TELL ME YOUR CARD!
>> cliche! Loveit!
>>
>> I can accommodate your 'terms' all pretty well except f. If the answers
>> are to ANY
>> of the 3 dummy questions - then I will have to try a FIRST QUESTION
>> FIRST protocol,
>> THEN I will quit.
> 
> You mean if you can't get the question right when it's always the first 
> question, you'll quit?


huh?  Sylvia Sylvia, if you want to test my power you must assume the hypothesis
that 1 billion religious people are right momentarily and like Mulder said to Scully
GO WITH IT SYLVIA!

www.MindReading.com

1 Q per day - put (Cosmology) next to your name so God doesn't use the bible instead,
and page numbers are 1..333, line 1..33.

Herc



Before posting this I checked if it was all good with a channel.

<<members of the selection committee of Epik for choosing me to receive this very special award of recognition.>>

Seems to be a comment on the subjective judge test.

ITS SOOOOO EASY TO TEST IF YOU USE BRAINS!


Herc