🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sep 29, 12:35 pm, "|-|ercules" <radgray...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote...
> > |-|ercules wrote:
> >> "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote
> >>>> -|ercules wrote:
> >>>> "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote ...
> >>>>>> -|ercules wrote:
> >>>>>> "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote
>
> >>>>>> If your answer is a set NO and you ask me for an answer then you
> >>>>>> broke the TOS.
>
> >>>>> Okay, let me get this right:
> >>>>> I think of a question, which must be one of the three questions I
> >>>>> offer, and you will answer that question by somehow using the page
> >>>>> and line nos. I enter. Are you saying that I am barred from asking
> >>>>> a question that has only one possible answer, or a question to
> >>>>> which I know the answer?
>
> >>>> It's a yes / no question, I look at the bible quote which will be
> >>>> God telling me something about your question or an answer.
>
> >>> You haven't cleared up the apparent restrictions with the question.
> >>> Above you imply that it can't be one with a "set" answer, which
> >>> appears to rule out any question I know the answer to.
>
> >>>> I work backwards to tell you exactly what your question was because
> >>>> skeptics are too docile to score a subjective answer.
>
> >>>>> In any case, you have a 1/2 chance of getting the right answer,
> >>>>> which is not unlikely enough to attribute a correct answer to mind
> >>>>> reading.
>
> >>>> Your stats escape me.
>
> >>> If all you are doing is giving me the answer (Your site says "Before
> >>> I attempt to answer your question I must read your mind what it
> >>> is!"), then you have a 1/2 chance of getting it right (Heads for
> >>> Yes/Tails for No). There's nothing there about determining the
> >>> question also. Is that a service commitment or just a bonus ?
>
> >>>> I can do it more than once BTW.
>
> >>>> Have you seen the newwww.MINDREADING.comsite?
>
> >>> Yes, that's where your link takes me. Isn't that what we've been
> >>> discussing? P.S. My Usenet server limits cross-posting to three other groups.
> >>> That's why I'm deleting some of the groups you've added.
>
> >> 1/ read the terms check box
>
> > I have read the terms and I agree with them.
>
> >> 2/ Guessing from 3 options is 3:1
>
> > Assuming that you are identifying the question. The site only claims to give the
> > correct answer, which is a 1/2 chance.
>
> >> Please think carefully before bombarding me with objections to a
> >> trivial website form.
>
> > These are not objections. I am trying to thoroughly understand what you are
> > claiming to be able to do and what restrictions on my questions exist (if any).
>
> > How about I just give you my questions.
>
> > At afternoon tea time, do I usually drink a cup of:
> > 1. Coffee?
> > 2. Hot chocolate?
> > 3. Tea?
>
> > One of those is the question I would like the answer to.
>
> > Page: 642
> > Line: 71
>
> huh?  I've explained over 200 times - a question you want to find out the answer to.
>
> Do any of you comprehend English?
>
> Here's your response.
>
> << Praise the Lord.  Praise the Lord>>
>
> I can NOT determine what your question was you were thinking of because
> you already know the answer.
>
> Yes, call me names, call me fail, call me copout, just do anything other
> than follow the simple rules.
>
> Herc

When will you learn that those trolls are just yanking your chain?