🚀 go-pugleaf

"Sylvia Else" <sylvia@not.here.invalid> wrote 
> On 26/09/2010 8:44 PM, |-|ercules wrote:
>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote
>>> On 9/26/2010 3:31 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>> "DanielSan" <danielsan@speakeasy.net> wrote...
>>>>> On 9/26/2010 3:13 AM, |-|ercules wrote:
>>>>>> "|-|ercules" <radgray123@yahoo.com> wrote ...
>>>>>>> Therefore, it's impossible for me to change my guess and still match
>>>>>>> the MD5.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well 99.9999999% of the time it's impossible.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can WINZIP your question with 256 bit encryption if you prefer,
>>>>>> then tell you the password after you have posted your question?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, do that. Provide my original question in a zip and then you can
>>>>> password protect it so I can't open it until I get the password from
>>>>> you. I won't reveal my question until I have confirmation that you
>>>>> can't change it on me.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My guess at DanielSan's question (from 3 options)
>>>>
>>>> www.hercshome.com/psychicquestion1.zip
>>>
>>> Is my cat a tortoiseshell?
>>
>>
>> That's not a question of interest.
>>
>> You ticked: I have a genuine or moderate interest in finding out the
>> answer to my question
>>
>> Don't you know what breed your own cat is?
>>
>> Null result.
> 
> Herc, the time to object to one of the questions is before it is 
> determined that you failed to choose it. Waiting until afterwards just 
> makes you look dishonest.
> 
> Sylvia.

I assumed it was one of the dummy questions.

If Daniel checked this text box it's not my fault.

You must agree to the following	  I have a genuine or moderate interest in finding out the answer to my question.


Looks like he asked a genuine question, forgot to ask genuine questions for 
the other 2 options, saw I was calling him on the test and played switcheroo.

He either lied on the form or switched answers.

But I will keep an eye out for morons in future.


Herc