🚀 go-pugleaf

"JTEM" <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote...
> 
> "|-|ercules" <radgray...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
>> www.popetoyou.com
> 
> Why would you put private videos on your web page,
> and then invite people to view them when you know
> they can't?
> 
> Your "Are Genesis Adam & Eve Alive Today?" video
> is private.
> 
> Secondly, your videos appear to have been taped in
> bed. Is there any reason for that which isn't incredibly
> gross?
> 
> Finally:  Is there a formal... um... some sort of "Standard"
> for your type of book divination?
> 
> In particular, I'm wondering if there's anything on the type
> of book, or where to STOP reading a passage.
> 
> Here's why:
> 
>> Is religion crazy?
>> The Earliest Generalizations
> 
> Clearly a sentence fragment.
> 
>> Is skepticism wrong?
>> suggest how research might be continued
> 
> This doesn't seem to be an answer to the question
> at all. At best, it could be interpreted as a means
> for ascertaining the answer.
> 
>> Is the need to generalize a good reason that belief in religion is sane?
>> We cannot assume or deduce everything that is possible.
> 
> Nothing wrong with the answer, but does it REALLY go with
> the question? Does anything?
> 
> For starters, it's a leading question (This "need to general" is
> assumed, and you're asking us to accept it). Secondly, "Belief
> in religion is sane" is an assumption. You're not asking it if
> belief in religion is sane, you're asking it if this imaginary "Need
> to generalize" is a good reason that it's sane...
> 
> Wait. That's still nonsense. Did you intend to declare that a
> reason that belief in religion is sane is that there's a need to
> generalize, and you want to know if that's a good thing or a
> bad thing?
> 
> Generalize.... what?
> 
> Anyhow, what's the random-book-passage-divination answer to
> gibberish like the above?
> 
>> We're looking for a sign (that God is true)?
>> 1 is true
> 
> Could this not be interpreted as "God is one"?
> 
> Which leads to more questions...


A serious post about bibliomancy!

The first question is "Is this religion idea crazy?"

Random Quote = "The Earliest Generalizations"

Nobody accepted it was a hit, so I asked (not on site)

"Is 'The Earliest Generalizations' a precise answer and the most concise answer
to belief in religion being sane?"

Random Quote = "We cannot assume or deduce everything possible".

Both very targeted if you ask me, though one could argue the first answer was a bit general.


Herc