🚀 go-pugleaf

"Peter Bowditch" <myfirstname@ratbags.com> wrote ...
> "|-|ercules" <radgray123@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
>>"Peter Bowditch" <myfirstname@ratbags.com> wrote ...
>>> george <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>On Sep 14, 12:44 am, Peter Bowditch <myfirstn...@ratbags.com> wrote:
>>>>> "|-|ercules" <radgray...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> >You invited me to be tested.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, I did not.
>>>>>
>>>> give it up mate.
>>>>You are dealing with a retard and no matter what sense you make it
>>>>won't get through..
>>>>Good try though
>>> 
>>> I know that, but he is blaming me specifically for his failure to even
>>> start to meet the conditions for the Australian Skeptics challenge.
>>> Life was much simpler when he was still under the court order to stay
>>> away from me.
>>> 
>>> I usually ignore him but he has been putting my name in spam to LEOs.
>>
>>Has it ever occurred to you that you've single handedly held up the world's
>>religion for ten years Peter?
> 
> Wow! How powerful is that?
> 
>>
>>Why do you insist Barry was being cooperative about mutually setting up a test?
> 
> Because that's the rules of the challenge.

Non sequitur



> 
>>
>>He gave me the 10 mammals test instead.
> 
> Which should have been a doddle for God.


Speculation 





>>
>>Barry is an atheist, he refused to test whether I was Genesis Adam.  THAT'S IT!
> 
> What test was proposed that would prove that you were someone who died
> several millennia ago (if he ever lived at all)? What test protocol
> was agreed?

Based on Genesis Adam of the bible.

I AM GENESIS ADAM - the bible was a prophecy.

So was James Bond.

Nostradamus = nostrils = to smell = to predict (before you taste)

Modern prophet = Ian Fleming


My claim is creation is merely the coming together of 1 male and 1 female
as the final phase of evolution.

homo sapiens 1 >> homo sapiens 2 = destiny



> 
> You went straight from "This vague thing is something I do" to "Give
> me the money or I will poison food".

Barry is supposed to help work out how to eliminate vagueness.

I said use blind judges and controls.

APPLICATION : DECEMBER 2001
YOU RIPPED ME OFF COMMENT : FEBRUARY 2002
IDLE POISON COMMENT : MARCH 2002






>>
>>And it's not a "sure sign" I'm mad, if you offer to test paranormal claims you
>>can't use Occam's razor on them.
> 
> Of course we can.


I made a testable claim, you cherry picked other applicants (if any) because you all 
hate religious people.


Herc