🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.skeptic
Article #5897

Re: "Post-SuperBowl Wife-Beating Frenzy" (was: Re: Bigtime Credulity Award)

#5897
From: Frederick Scott
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 1995 00:00
42 lines
3196 bytes
Ford Prefect <remailer@bi-node.zerberus.de> writes: 

> fred_s@anthrax.cisco.com:
> fs> I'm
> fs> not saying I don't go a day or two now and then and miss it due to
> fs> vacations and so forth but if it were as impressively well-publicized
> fs> as some here make it sound, there's no way I could be unfamiliar with
> fs> it.
>
>"He's not famous; _I've_ never heard of him!"

That's an easy retort.  When multiple people are saying it, it's kind of a
silly one, though.

>In San Francisco it was primarily a broadcast media story that peaked in '93.
>The SF area TV stations covered it heavily in the days preceeding the
>Superbowl, but otherwise it was rarely mentioned in the off-season except in
>dubious media "public affairs" dronings about spousal abuse or sports
>violence.  Prior to Superbowl Sunday, however, I saw it referred to on each
>Saturday evening local news broadcast I saw, and sometimes in considerable
>depth - including interviews with abuse hotline personnel, etc.  As I said,
>in '92 - '93 period, I am positive that I heard at least two-dozen
>references to it on TV and radio, including NPR.
>
>I don't remember seeing anything about it in The Comical, but I rarely
>read it.  The Comical and The Murky News are scarcely exemplars of
>scholarly journalism, but I still expect a slightly higher level of
>research from newspapers.  TV, on the other hand, will spout virtually
>any sensationalist, boohhoo nonsense that sounds juicy, so it's natural
>that they made a bigger story of this UL.

Don't you think it's a bit hard to believe that a news item would make TV news
constantly yet not really make a splash at all in the papers?  That's one of
the reasons I tend to avoid TV news - the total lack of depth and an adherence
to fluff reporting.  But anything covered _that_ widely on TV is going to make
it either on the front page of a newspaper (if general news) or on the front
page of a sports section (if sports news).  If it's an individual station's (or
network's) feature report, it might actually get a lot of time without really
being covered in the papers but only on the one station (or network) - for the
same reasons it didn't make the papers.

Fred
Technical Details
Message-ID: <447d81$bca@cronkite.cisco.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <441s8f$8hl@cronkite.cisco.com> <43tfns$m1h@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> <m0swZjr-0002LDC@bi-node.zerberus.de> <m0sx5BQ-000286C@bi-node.zerberus.de>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f44bc,55cb1fd555e7fccf
X-Google-Attributes: gidf44bc,public
X-Google-Thread: 10c820,3781869e97ffbfdd
X-Google-Attributes: gid10c820,public
X-Google-Thread: 10f3ae,55cb1fd555e7fccf
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f3ae,public
X-Google-Thread: f7224,3781869e97ffbfdd
X-Google-Attributes: gidf7224,public
X-Google-Thread: 10432c,3781869e97ffbfdd
X-Google-Attributes: gid10432c,public
From: fred_s@anthrax.cisco.com (Frederick Scott)
Subject: Re: "Post-SuperBowl Wife-Beating Frenzy" (was: Re: Bigtime Credulity Award)
Date: 1995/09/25
Message-ID: <447d81$bca@cronkite.cisco.com>
X-Deja-AN: 110785019
references: <441s8f$8hl@cronkite.cisco.com> <43tfns$m1h@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> <m0swZjr-0002LDC@bi-node.zerberus.de> <m0sx5BQ-000286C@bi-node.zerberus.de>
organization: Nerds On Parade
newsgroups: sci.skeptic,alt.folklore.urban,rec.sport.football.pro,alt.sports.football.pro.sf-49ers,ba.sports