Article View: sci.skeptic
Article #5897Re: "Post-SuperBowl Wife-Beating Frenzy" (was: Re: Bigtime Credulity Award)
From: Frederick Scott
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 1995 00:00
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 1995 00:00
42 lines
3196 bytes
3196 bytes
Ford Prefect <remailer@bi-node.zerberus.de> writes: > fred_s@anthrax.cisco.com: > fs> I'm > fs> not saying I don't go a day or two now and then and miss it due to > fs> vacations and so forth but if it were as impressively well-publicized > fs> as some here make it sound, there's no way I could be unfamiliar with > fs> it. > >"He's not famous; _I've_ never heard of him!" That's an easy retort. When multiple people are saying it, it's kind of a silly one, though. >In San Francisco it was primarily a broadcast media story that peaked in '93. >The SF area TV stations covered it heavily in the days preceeding the >Superbowl, but otherwise it was rarely mentioned in the off-season except in >dubious media "public affairs" dronings about spousal abuse or sports >violence. Prior to Superbowl Sunday, however, I saw it referred to on each >Saturday evening local news broadcast I saw, and sometimes in considerable >depth - including interviews with abuse hotline personnel, etc. As I said, >in '92 - '93 period, I am positive that I heard at least two-dozen >references to it on TV and radio, including NPR. > >I don't remember seeing anything about it in The Comical, but I rarely >read it. The Comical and The Murky News are scarcely exemplars of >scholarly journalism, but I still expect a slightly higher level of >research from newspapers. TV, on the other hand, will spout virtually >any sensationalist, boohhoo nonsense that sounds juicy, so it's natural >that they made a bigger story of this UL. Don't you think it's a bit hard to believe that a news item would make TV news constantly yet not really make a splash at all in the papers? That's one of the reasons I tend to avoid TV news - the total lack of depth and an adherence to fluff reporting. But anything covered _that_ widely on TV is going to make it either on the front page of a newspaper (if general news) or on the front page of a sports section (if sports news). If it's an individual station's (or network's) feature report, it might actually get a lot of time without really being covered in the papers but only on the one station (or network) - for the same reasons it didn't make the papers. Fred
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<447d81$bca@cronkite.cisco.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<441s8f$8hl@cronkite.cisco.com> <43tfns$m1h@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> <m0swZjr-0002LDC@bi-node.zerberus.de> <m0sx5BQ-000286C@bi-node.zerberus.de>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f44bc,55cb1fd555e7fccf X-Google-Attributes: gidf44bc,public X-Google-Thread: 10c820,3781869e97ffbfdd X-Google-Attributes: gid10c820,public X-Google-Thread: 10f3ae,55cb1fd555e7fccf X-Google-Attributes: gid10f3ae,public X-Google-Thread: f7224,3781869e97ffbfdd X-Google-Attributes: gidf7224,public X-Google-Thread: 10432c,3781869e97ffbfdd X-Google-Attributes: gid10432c,public From: fred_s@anthrax.cisco.com (Frederick Scott) Subject: Re: "Post-SuperBowl Wife-Beating Frenzy" (was: Re: Bigtime Credulity Award) Date: 1995/09/25 Message-ID: <447d81$bca@cronkite.cisco.com> X-Deja-AN: 110785019 references: <441s8f$8hl@cronkite.cisco.com> <43tfns$m1h@ixnews2.ix.netcom.com> <m0swZjr-0002LDC@bi-node.zerberus.de> <m0sx5BQ-000286C@bi-node.zerberus.de> organization: Nerds On Parade newsgroups: sci.skeptic,alt.folklore.urban,rec.sport.football.pro,alt.sports.football.pro.sf-49ers,ba.sports