Article View: sci.skeptic
Article #6202Re: Why, SMITHSONIAN Even Lies to Congressmen...
From: EjP
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 16:12
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 16:12
1198 lines
43248 bytes
43248 bytes
Ironically, I doubt whether even a highly paid PR consultant could have generated as much sympathy and respect for the hardworking folks at the Smithsonian than Mr. Conrad has with this ridiculous post. -E Ed Conrad wrote: >> >> SMITHSONIAN'S LETTER TO U.S. CONGRESSMAN >> > > A little conspiracy music, Maestro"> > >>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/crypt.gif >> >> > > Honorable. Gus Yatron > U.S. House of Representatives > Washington, D.C. 20515 > Dec. 17, 1982 > < > Dear Mr. Yatron: > < > Thank you for your letter on behalf of Ed Conrad of Shenandoah, > Pennsylvania. > < > The Smithsonian's experience with Mr. Conrad began in the summer of > 1981 when, without prior arrangement, he arrived at the west loading > dock of the National Museum of Natural History with a large rock in > his car trunk. > < > At that time five staff membrs, representing the departments of > Anthropology, Mineral Sciences and Paleobiology, determined that his > material was inorganic in origin. > < > Since then the staff of the Department of Paleobiology has examined > concretions, root casts, quartz veins, photographs, xeroxed copies of > photographs, and infra-red scans for him. > < > The contents involved consultations with no fewer than eleven staff > members of the National Museum of Natural History; we believe the > letters speak for themselves. > < > The Smithsonian has acted in good faith in this matter and cannot > change its opinion on the material it has seen so far. We would > encourage Mr. Conrad to seek confirmation of his opinions elsewhere. > < > In addition, we would recommed that he submit his ideas to a > scientific journal so they may be discussed in an open forum. > < > Sincerely yours. > < > Margaret Hird (signed) > < > Margaret C. Hird > Special Assistant to the President > < > >> =========================== > > < > >> ED CONRAD'S RESPONSE PROVING SMITHSONIAN LIED >> > > Hon. Gus Yatron > Member, U.S. Congress > 2267 Rayburn House Office Bldg. > Washington, D.C. 20560 > Jan. 8, 1985 > < > Dear Congressman Yatron: > < > I truly relish this golden opportunity to respond to the contents of > the letter forwarded to you by Margaret C. Hird, special assistant to > the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. > < > I had to read only the first paragraph to prove that she, and the > Smithsonian, were lying. > < > Ms. Hird states that "without prior arrangement, he (Conrad) arrived > at the west loading dock of the National Museum of Natural History > with a large rock in his car trunk." > < > This is in direct conflict with the facts. To prove this is a > mistatement of truth on the Smithsonian's part, I have enclosed a copy > of a parking permit for the date in question, Aug. 25, 1981. > < > >>http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/FOSSILx/parking.gif > > < > I could have hardly reached the vicinity of the west loading dock > without produicing this parking permit to a guard when pulling onto > Smithsonian property. Actually, it was the guard who examined the > parking -- and access -- pass, permitted my entry and, in fact, gave > me directions to the west dock. > < > The parking permit had been mailed to me by Ramond Rye II, of the > Smithsonian's Department of Paleobology, folllowng my telephone > conversation with him previoulsy. > < > The inprinted date certainly is sufficient proof that I had not > arrived at the Smithsonian "without prior arrangement." . . . > < > "I repeat the accusation I had made against the Smithsonian in > previous communciation to you: The Smithsonian and its people are > conspiring to suppress scientific data and it, in fact, has gone so > far as to tamper wth scientific evidence in order to achieve its goal > of protecting Darwin's erroneous theory of man's origin... > < > Sincerely yours, > Ed Conrad > < > ============================================== > >> SMITHSONIAN PHONY AS A THREE-DOLLAR BILL >> > > This article details incredible anthropological discoveries made > in Pennsylvania's anthracite region -- petrified bones, teeth and > soft organs (some human) -- that annihilates the theory of the > evolution of man. > > The corrupt Scientific Establishment has been avoiding honest, > courageous investigation of any sort regarding these specimens > and just wishes these discoveries would go away, which they won't. > >>===================================== >> MAN AS OLD AS COAL >>===================================== >> > > PETRIFIED FINGER AND TOE: > >>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Au29/MVC-016S.JPG >> > > > You should be displeased to know that truth is no longer playing > second fiddle to the fiction, fantasy and fairy tales that have been > dished out for more than a century about man's origin and ancestry. > < > At long last, it's nearing the official end of the deceit, deception, > collusion and conspiracy that has long been perpetrated by arrogant, > egotistical members of the Scientific Establishment in and out of its > hallowed Halls of Learning -- the Smithsonian Institution, foremost. > < > Their monumental hoax on mankind has more than met its match > with the discovery of undeniable physical evidence that, > multi-millions of years ago, the good earth wasn't anything like what > has long been depicted by the scientific community. > < > For one thing, man -- in almost our present form -- existed while > coal was being formed, and our ancestors lived alongside giant > scorpions, dinosaurs and beasts with six-inch-high canine teeth. > < > And man and animals had one thing in common. Both were > annihilated in some incredible catastrophe that blew them limb > from limb and scattered their bones, teeth and soft organs > in all directions. > > This is an underground mining map showing coal veins > that were vioently disrupted, and where most of these > fossils came from. > > > http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Fossils/MVC-033S.JPG > < > What happened next is a testament to the late, great Immanuel > Velikovsky who, more than a half-century ago, wrote that the true > story of earth's -- and man's -- past is written in the rocks, visible > for all to see as part of the fossil record. > < > Eons ago, before coal hardened, some sort of fluid engulfed the > bones, teeth and soft organs just after the great catastrophe, causing > them to petrifiy and now offers a mindboggling horror story of > mankind's far-distant past. > < > That man existed during the Carboniferous Period also offers > proof that we could not possibly have evolved as suggested > by the Darwin Theory. > < > Rightly so, because the theory of the evolution of man never > possessed a shred of physical evidence in the first place. It > was -- and is -- a sham. > > Man could not -- and did not -- become such a magnificent machine > by a series of incredible accidents of nature because that's an > astronomical mathematical absurdity. > < > Even Charles Darwin had a sneaky suspicion his theory was full > of hot air. > < > >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/truth/tosuppose.gif > > < > And Earnest Hooton, longtime professor of anthropology at Harvard > University, seconded the motion years later in his book, "Apes, Men > and Morons," citing the absence of undeniable physical evidence. > > >>" I can point to many anatomical >> features of man in which the known >> courses of evolution can be explained >> plausibly by the theory of natural >> selection, but I do not know of one >> in which it can be proved." > > < > But, since we were spoon-fed such pablum -- the evolution of man -- > by members of the omniscient Scientific Establishment, most of us > ate up every word. These pompous asses were neither to be > questioned nor challenged. > < > About a year after finding my first specimen of petrified bone between > coal veins in June 1981, I couldn't believe the incedible resistence > I was encountering in my pursuit of honest investigation. > < > My longtime friend, Clayton Lennon (1900-1996), warned me it > wouldn't be easy and one day, between puffs of his cigar, > summed up my despair quite eloquently . > < > >>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/edyournot.gif > > < > Meanwhile, as their noses continued to grow (from lies), so also > did the arrogance of members of the Scientific Establishment who > had long lost the goal of a search for truth. The only important thing > to them, I soon learned, was to make no waves and concentrate > on protecting their vested interests. > < > Over time, they had become incredibly ruthless and bold, really > believing that -- as members of omnipotent Acadamia -- they could > do anything they damn well pleased and answer to no one.. > < > Since I have had a ringside seat over these past 23 years, it has > included not only their denial of physical evidence that could -- > would -- destroy the theory of the evolution of man but actually > tampering with that evidence. And I have come right out and named > names. > < > Then, with brass testicles, the "criminals" were actually belitting > the victim, with character assassination leveled like a Gatling gun. > < > And even worse, the assault on truth was adamantly defended by > their colleagues, and still is. > < > Fortunately, for your grandchildren and mine, that day is over. > The pseudoscientists' day of reckoning has finally arrived. > < > But it comes as no surprise. After all, they had been forewarned: > < > >>>http://edconrad.com/canals/hooton.gif > > < > ================================================== > < > TRUTH FINALLY CATCHES UP TO THE PERPETRATORS > OF DECEIT, DECEPTION, COLLUSION AND CONSPIRACY > < > =================================================== > < > >>> MAN AS OLD AS COAL >>> All Specimens Found Between Anthracite Veins > > < > (Strata geologically dated at a minimum of 280 million years) > < > Here are just a few of the thousands upon thousands of specimens > of petrified bones, teeth and/or even soft organs -- some human -- > that I have discovered between two separate anthracite veins > in Northeastern Pennsylvania over the past 23 years. > < > >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z11calv.jpg >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z8femur.jpg >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z5gall.jpg >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/newtibia.jpg >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/skullb.jpg >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z9lung.jpg >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/brain/MVC-001S.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/1tooth.jpg >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix3/z3dino.jpg >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-013F.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/pp/MVC-022S.JPG > > < > Strange, according to scientific doctrine, they couldn't possibly > have been found in Carboniferous strata, dated at a minimum > of 280 million years. > < > You see, every scientific textbook insists that no large land > animals, let alone man, existed back then. Hell, man wouldn't begin > evolving until multi-millions of years later, the pseudos proclaimed. > < > But the incredible arsenal of petrified bones, teeth and even soft > organs proves -- beyond doubt -- that man and large land animals > indeed had been around when coal was being formed. Otherwise, > their mortal remains could not have been preserved between layers > of anthracite as the result of a catastrophe beyond our wildest > imagination. > < > And, since this is the grim evidence that a catastrophe happened > before, there is NO question that it could happen again. > < > Velikovsky provided evidence of catastrophes in his two books, > "Worlds in Collision" and "Earth in Upheaval," published back > in the early 1950s. In them, he offered undeniable evidence of > calamities beyond human comprehension but was ridiculed > and badmouthed by members of the deceitful, dishonest Scientific > Establishment. > < > Here's a copy of these two books, in paperback, and an explanation > why Velikovsky was treated with scorn and contempt, which is how > members of the Scientific Establishment have treated me for the last > 23 years. > < > >>>==================================================== < >>>http://edconrad.com/ebay/Petrifiedx/MVC-010S.JPG >>>http://edconrad.com/ebay/Petrifiedx/MVC-011S.JPG > > < > >>>==================================================== > > < > A longtime newspaperman, I figured -- realizing I was getting > the shaft from the Scientific Establishment -- I'd get a fair shake > from newspapers in an effort to tell my story. > < > I thought editors would be genuinely interested in what might've > sounded like a farfetched story, except that it was backed up by > petrified bones, teeth and soft organs as old as coal. > < > Reporters from the Allentown (Pa.) Call-Chronicle and Las Vegas > Sun, to mention just two, were greatly impressed. But when their > stories appeared in print, it took my breath away. The articles were > completely negative, making me look like that proverbial horse's > ass. > < > Naturally, there was nothing I could do about it, so I had to give up > on newspapers completely. I had long known the New York Times, > Washington Post and Philadelphia Inquirer wouldn't touch it because > they had several opportunities to do so but bowed to their vested > interests and ignored me. > < > Ditto for the TV network news shows like "60 Minutes." > < > For the longest time, it appeared the world would never know the truth > about the catastrophe that decimated both man and animal while coal > was being formed. > < > Then a miracle happened -- along came the Internet which gave me > a way to reach the pubic. But, of course, the public wasn't paying > attention because members of the Scientific Establishment kept making > me look like a fool and an imbecile. > < > And, if you recall, they had been doing a mighty fine job of it > right up until now I assembled the assortment of petrified bones, > teeth and soft organs (some human). That's when members of the > Scientific Establishment got the second biggest shock of their lives, > dwarfed only by the second jet plowing into the Twin Towers. > < > Suddenly overnight, with the presentation of an arsenal of physical > evidence, the ridicule and character assassination have eased > somewhat. > < > Suddenly, their cannons had ran out of ammunition, accusations that > I'm a liar and a fraud. > < > Suddenly, these Clown Princes of Science -- long having made > a joke at the expense of sacred Science -- finally realized that > their involvement in deceit, deception, collusion and conspiracy > might finally be catching up to them and their monumental fraud. > < > These Omniscient Buffoons have defended their colleagues > who, with incredible audacity, have made a mockery of physical > evidence, totally ignoring it and sometimes even tampering with it. > < > Thomas Alva Edison probably put in a nutshell what they were > doing for so long, and my dear friend Clayton was right on target, > too. > < > >>http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/quotesnew.gif > > < > =========================================== > >>========= SOME OF THE SPECIMENS ========= > > =========================================== > < > >>THE VERY FIRST DISCOVERY > > < > The following is the very first discovery of petrified bone in > coal-bearing Carboniferous strata in June 1981. > < > >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/first.jpg > > < > The specimen, which I found by accident, resembled a giant skull > and the Smithsonian expressed an interest after receiving a photo, > inviting me to bring it down to Washington so it could be examined > firsthand. > < > Three of its "experts" -- an anthropologist, a paleontologist and a > geologist -- looked it over carefully but, after a few minutes, > concurred that it was nothing more than a rock or concretion, > certainly nothng that had ever lived. > < > No one mentioned that a microscopic study of the specimen's > cellular structure would accurately identify whether it is or is not > bone. (I had no knowledge of this fact at the time and wouldn't > become aware of it until many months later) > < > >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/brain/textbook.gif >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix3/thefactthat.gif > > < > In any event, while preparing to leave the Smithsonian, I politely > asked if they would want to keep the specimen, perhaps to break > apart the jaw-like area to see if teeth could be found inside. The > three "experts" -- Joseph Brown and Robert McCurdy, the only > two names I remember -- laughed at me and said it would be > an absolute waste of their time. > < > About a month later -- rather discouraged -- I decided to search > the interior of the jaw-like area on my own. It began with a icepick > to penetrate the rock hardness, then using all sorts of small tools > to reach inside and, strangely, begin pulling out what resembled > brownish dirt. > < > I was mysified that some sort of cavity existed and contacted > the Smithsonian about this -- but was totally ignored. > < > After several weeks of part-time probing, I found a pair of peculiar > objects inside. Photos were taken, greatly enlarged and sent to > Krogman, one of the world's foremost human anatomists who > wrote the book, "The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine." > < > Our friendship had begun months previous when I had driven > to Lancaster to show him the first strange specimen I had found > that had come from between coal veins -- the large skull that > the Smithsonian later dismissed as a rock. > < > Krogman studied the photo of the inclusion, then told me over > the phone that the object is definitely a premolar tooth because > "I can see a pair of cusps." > < > Here's the photo that Krogman had examined, with the dime > offering an indication of size. > < > >>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-014S.JPG > > < > The photo below shows another view of where the premolar was > attached. > < > >>>http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/z1.jpg > > < > Krogman suggested an infrared scan be performed and it was done > at American Medical Laboratories in Chantilly, Va. Here's the result > of the test: > < > >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/graph.gif > > < > This is what the laboratory stated in its official report: > < > >>>http://edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix3/result.gif > > < > It meant that the inclusion in the jaw-like area was neither rock > nor concretion but something that once lived. > < > When the scan was interpreted later, this fact was confirmed. > < > >>>http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/compatible.gif > > < > It also should be emphasized that microscopic study of the > skull-like object was conducted and Haversian canals -- miniscule > circles, the tell-tale sign of bone -- were visible. > < > It had prompted Krogman, at one point, to offer great encourgement, > as he followed the discoveries with great interest.: > < > >>>http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/krogquote.gif > > < > >>>============================================ >>>PETRIFIED HUMAN SKULL > > < > The following specimen was identified by Krogman as a petrified > human calvarium -- a skull with the eye sockets broken off -- after > he personally had examined it and even measured it with > caliphers, expressing pleasure with the results.. > < > Krogman, who was personally invited by the Egyptian government > to be present when a Pharoah's tomb was opened years before, is > shown holding the calvarium in the second photo. > < > >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z11calv.jpg >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/krogwskull.jpg > > < > Moments after this photo was taken of Krogman with the specimen, > an associate -- a medical doctor -- walked into his office at the > Cooper Clinic in Lancaster, Pa., and he told him to come closer > to see "the oldest human skull ever found." > < > Two other photos of the specimen: > < > >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/MVC-006S.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/MVC-007S.JPG > > < > Meanwhile, a CATscan revealed a second protrusion not visible > to the naked eye but located precisely where it would be expected > to be found in a human cranium. > < > Here's a copy of that scan: > < > >>>http://www.edconrad.com/images/catcalv.jpg > > < > This specimen also tested positive for the presence of Haversian > canals under microscopic scrutiny. > < > Additionally, American Medical Laboratories performed testing > of calculus analysis by crystallography on the specimen and > found "a composition of dried blood intermingled with a few > small crystals resembling calcium oxalate dihydrate." > < > The laboratory's official report follows: > < > >>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-012S.JPG < >>> >>>============================================= < >> >>ANOTHER PETRIFIED HUMAN SKULL -- IN A BOULDER > > < > Another petrified human cranium was found approximately > a year later only a short distance from where the human > calvarium was discovered. > < > It was -- still is -- embedded in a boulder.. > < > >>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/skulla.jpg >>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/skullb.jpg >>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/other1.jpg >>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z2_2.jpg > > < > The Smithsonian was sent a photograph and Raymond Rye, > musem specialist, replied in writing: "The object ... does resemble > the outline of a human skull ... We must do a microscopic study > of the outer rind to determine if it has the structure of bone." > < > >>>http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/rr072782.gif > > < > The Smithsonian had been mailed granules, as requested, then > weeks later replied: "X-ray analysis of the material reveals it to be > quartz, the most abundant material of the earth's crust. So, although > the enigmatic object exposed in the boulder may resemble a hominid > skull, its mineral compostion is definitely not that of bone." > < > >>>http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/rr090982.gif > > < > The fact is, "x-ray analysis" is NOTan appropriate test to identify > the presence or absence of cellular structure. > < > Later, a microcopic photo of granules removed from the specimen > revealed the presence of Haversian canals. (Actually, I knew they > did ahead of time because I had examined other granules > microscopically before sending them to the Smithsonian.) > < > Here's one of those microscopic photos of the cell structure: > < > >>>http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/proof1.jpg > > < > >>================================================ < >>PETRIFIED HUMAN FEMUR > > < > This is a petrified human femur still embedded in shale, > a near-cousin of coal. Portions of the bulb ends have broken off. > < > >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z6femur.jpg >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z8femur.jpg >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/z7femur.jpg >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Spec/MVC-001S.JPG > > < > Since a femur measures approximately one-fourth of a human > being's height, the femur belonged to someone at least 7 1/2-foot > tall. > < > >>>===================================================== < >> >>PORTION OF A TIBIA (The subject of fraudulently testing by Andrew >>MacRae) > > < > This specimen was identified as a portion of a tibia by Krogman > and was subjected to one of the greatest cover-ups in the history > of science. > < > >>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/newtibia.jpg > > < > Andrew Macrae, then of Calgary University, performed fraudulent > testing when entrusted to examine its cellular structure and publish > the microscopic photos on his web page. Instead. he posted > microscopic photos of a rock or a concretion. > < > Macrae undoubtedly was advised and assisted by Paul Myers, then > of Temple University in Philadelphia and now at the University of > Minnesota. > < > When charged with participating in the scam, Myers adamantly denied > it. Then, when I suggested officials of Temple University check their > long-distance telephone calls during the time that Macrae was > "testing" the specimen in the summer of 1996, Myers suddenly admitted > in the talk.origins news group that he had made many phone calls > to Calgary University in that time span but on other business. > < > It didn't end there. Myers later admitted in talk.origins that he had > FLOWN to Calgary one weekend during that same time period and had > spent time on campus. He said he didn't even have a chance to say > hello to Macrae, claiming he was there on other business. > < > Here are two additional photos of the portion of the petrified tibia, > (known as EC96-001 for Macrae's fraudulent testing purposes). > < > >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossil/z15tib2.jpg >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossil/z15tib1.jpg > > < > In addition, a scanning electronic microscope (SEM) was used > to examine the interior surface features of this specimen and then > compare it with cadaver bone at the same power magnification. These > are the photos at 2,000-times magnification:. > < > >>>http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/bones.jpg > > < > (They would look incredibly similiar if the grains were lying in > exactly the same direction.) > < > The left photo in the first URL below shows what Andrew Macrae > posted on his web page, claiming it was the cell structure of > EC96-001 and nothing like bone should look like (in the right photo). > The next two photos show EC96-001's true cell structure. > < > >>>http://www.edconrad.com/canals/ts_compare1.jpg >>>http://edconrad.com/canals/slide1.jpg >>>http://www.edconrad.com/canals/0505160x.jpg > > < > It was just one of several fraudulent maneuvers perpetrated > by members of the Scientifiic Establishment over the past 23 > years when the first specimen -- the large petrified skull -- was > discovered. > < > Additionally, American Medical Laboratories performed calculus > analysis by crystallography on EC96-001 and determined that it > "consisted predominately of dried blood and protein." > < > That report follows: > < > >>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-006S.JPG >> >>>============================================== >> >>PETRIFIED FINGER AND TOE: >>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Au29/MVC-016S.JPG >> >> >>>=============================================== >> >>PETRIFIED MANDIBLE > > Here's a phtoo of a petrified human mandibles (jaw bones), found > between the same coal veins: > < > >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-006S.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-003S.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-011S.JPG < >>>============================================== > > < > >>PETRIFIED HUMAN LUNG > > < > Here's a petrified human lung found between coal veins. > < > >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-015S.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-016S.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-017S.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-018S.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-019S.JPG > > < > A lung is a soft organ and, as such, many contend it can never > petrify. However, in recent years it was established conclusively > that soft organs can indeed be subjected to the petrification process. > < > >>>============================================ > > < > >>PETRIFIED GALL BLADDER, WITH GALLSTONE > > < > Here's a petrified gall bladder, and a CATscan revealed the presence > of a gall stone inside. > < > >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z5gall.jpg > > < > This is one of the specimens that also was tested at American > Medical Laboratories via calculus analysis by crystallography. > < > It revealed the specimen "consists of a few small pieces of dried > blood," adding that "none of the constituents normally found > in urinary calculi are present." (which comes as no surprise since > the specimen it tested is petrified). > < > That report follows: > < > >>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-010S.JPG < >> >>============================================== < >>PETRIFIED HUMAN BRAIN > > < > This is a petrified human brain (one hemisphere): > < > >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/brain/MVC-001S.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/brain/MVC-002S.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/brain/MVC-003S.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/brain/MVC-004S.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/brain/MVC-005S.JPG < >> >>============================================ < >> >>>ANOTHER PETRIFIED BONE > > < > Here's another petrified bone (a knee?): > >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix4/MVC-013S.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix4/MVC-012S.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix4/MVC-014S.JPG >> >>============================================= > > < > >>PAIR OF PETRIFIED FETUSES > > < > Here are a pair of petrified fetuses.The large one, which has > been transformed to a coal-like substance, measures 6 1/2 > inches in length. > < > >>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-010S.JPG >>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-011S.JPG < >> >>=============================================== < >>PETRIFIED DINOSAUR FOOT > > < > Here's a portion of a dinosaur foot embedded in slate (or shale): > < > >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix3/z3dino.jpg >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-013S.JPG > > < > It should be noted that a third "toe" was later found embedded > in the slate where it would be expected to be. A video tape exists > showing the top cover of slate patiently being removed, revealing > the third "toe" just beneath the surface. > < > I should mention that the petrified femur and petrifed dinosaur > foot remain as you see them -- still embedded in slate (or shale) > -- the way they were steamshoveled from between coal veins. > < > They are somewhere in this photo, taken from approximately five > miles up, of scar-marked land that was strip-mined of its coal. But > those remarkable discoveries are still there if you'd like to search. > < > >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/MVC-015S.JPG >> >>============================================= > > < > >>HANDCRAFTED WOODEN TOOL > > < > Here's a petrified handcrafted wooden handle which has been > transformed to anthracite. It also was found between the same > two coal veins. > < > >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-001S.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-002S.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-004S.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-003S.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-005S.JPG < >>>============================================ > > < > >>PETRIFIED BONE EMBEDDED IN SLATE > > < > Here's a portion of petrified bone still embedded in slate, > confirming that it's older than the material in which it was encased. > Obviously, that material had to be fluid or in a fluidy state for > something to harden around it. > < > >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-014S.JPG >>> >>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-015S.JPG >>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-016S.JPG >>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-017S.JPG >>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-018S.JPG >>> >>>============================================ >> >>GIANT CANINE TOOTH > > > Here's a giant canine tooth, found between the same coal veins: > > >>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/1tooth.jpg >>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-009S.JPG >>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-007S.JPG >>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-008S.JPG >>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-006S.JPG >>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-010S.JPG > > < > (I accidentally dropped the giant tooth on the sidewalk in Hazleton, > Pa. -- too heavy for the paper bag --and the tip broke off but the > two pieces fit together almost perfectly.) > < > >>>================================================== > > < > >>PETRIFIED FETUS EMBEDDED IN SLATE > > < > Here's another petrified fetus, this one still embedded in slate > (or shale). > < > >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Day/MVC-005S.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Day/MVC-002S.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Day/MVC-004S.JPG < >> >>================================================ > > < > >>PORTION OF GIANT PETRIFIED SCORPION > > < > This is a portion of a giant prehistoric scorpion that was > identified as such by Wilton Krogman. > < > When the world famous bone expert examined this specimen > found between coal veins, he first turned to me and mentioned > that he had performed countless disections of scorpions in college. > < > "What you have, Mr. Conrad (never Ed), is a portion of a giant > prehistoric scorpion," he told me. > < > When discovered, the specimen was broken in two parts but they > fit together perfectly. > < > >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-001S.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-022S.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-020S.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-008S.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-017S.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/MVC-006S.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-021S.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-009S.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-019S.JPG > > < > This particular specimen was the subject of another cover-up > by members of the Scientific Establishment -- the Department of > Entomology at Penn State University. > < > Penn State actually has batted 0-for-3 with its attempted > cover-ups of my specimens: First, its Department of Paleontology > (Roger Cuffey); Second, its Department of Anthropology (Robert > Eckardt). Third, its Department of Entomology (Charles Pitts). > < > >>>=========================================== > > ' < > >>YERKES CONFIRMS SPECIMEN IS BONE > > > One of the specimens found between anthracite veins was positively > identified as petrified bone by the Yerkes Regional Primate Research > Center at Emory University in Atlanta, Ga., which Krogman described > as "the most prestigious institution of its kind in the world." > < > Jeremy Dahl, one of its bone experts who examined and tested it, > even put it in writing and signed his name, also making a drawing > of the specimen that he had examined and tested.. > < > >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/YERKES1.TIF >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/YERKES2.TIF >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/YERKES3.TIF > > < > Dahl definitely had examined the specimen's cell structure because > he had cut off a slice while it was is possession. > < > >>================================================= < >>PETRIFIED HOMINID MANDIBLE > > < > Here's another petrified hominid jaw, the frontal portion. Inclusions > are embedded in it, possibly teeth or even part of the tongue. > < > >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix5/MVC-002S.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix5/MVC-001S.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix5/MVC-003S.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix5/MVC-004S.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix5/MVC-005S.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix5/MVC-006S.JPG < >>>================================================ > > < > >>ANOTHER PETRIFIED SOFT ORGAN > > < > Here's another soft organ that had petrified: > < > >>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-008S.JPG >>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-011S.JPG >>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-010S.JPG >>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-009S.JPG >>> >>>============================================= > > < > >> PETRIFIED EGGS > > < > Here are what appear to be petrified eggs. About eight of them > were found together more than 200 feet below the original > surface of the ground (on the side wall of a stripping pit). > < > >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-021F.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-022F.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-023F.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-024F.JPG > > < > >>>========================================== > > < > >>SOMEWHAT SIMILIAR SPECIMENS > > < > Here are two strange specimens, almost similiar. What makes them > so intriguing is that they were found between anthracite veins some > 40 miles apart -- one near Shenandoah and the other near Wilkes-Barre. > < > >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-016S.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-017S.JPG < >>>=============================================== < >> >>THREE INTRIGUING SPECIMENS > > > Here are three intriguing specimens: > (For the kids' sake, let's call 'em "The Three Tenors.) > < > >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-004S.JPG >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-005S.JPG < >>>=============================================== < >> >>RAYMOND DART IMPRESSED > > < > The late, great Raymond Dart, MD., relished the opportunity to examine > some of the specimens after Krogman had informed him about them. > < > This photo shows Dart holding what Krogman identified as a calvarium, > a human cranium with the eye sockets broken off. > < > >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/dart.jpg > > < > Here's Raymond Dart's letter: > < > >>=============================================== >> >>> 28 October, 1983 >>> >>>Dear Mr. Conrad: >>> >>>This is being written as a follow-up to our meeting here in >>>Philadelphia on Saturday, Oct. 15, during which I had the >>>opportunity to examine many of the rock-like objects you >>>had discovered in the coal fields of Pennsylvania, near >>>Shenandoah. < >>>In my opinion, the vast majority bear the contour of bone >>> >>>>and may well be petrified bone. >>>> >>> >>>I was particularly intrigued by one of your specimens which >>>I agree bears a distinct resemblance to a dainosaur head >>>or a homind skullcap, heavily petrified. < >>>Based on our vast ignorance about vulconology, as regards >>>both anatomy and anthropology, I am of the opinion that your >>>findings definitely warrant intense investigation by that subject's >>>foremost experts, especially here in America where so many >>>volcanic disturbances occur even today. < >>> Yours sincerely, >>> >>>> Raymond A. Dart (signed) >>> >>>Raymond A. Dart, M.D. >>>Institute of Man >>>The Institutes for the Achievement of Human Potential >>>8801 Stenton Avenue >>>Philadelphia, Pa. 19118 > > > Here's a photo of Raymond Dart with Ed Conrad (the photo was > taken by a house painter who obliged by decending a ladder > to do so.) > < > >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/wdart.jpg < >> >>=============================================== > > < > >>DINOSAUR FOOT EMBEDDED IN SLATE > > < > That man co-existed with dinosaurs -- back while anthracite was > being formed -- gains credence with these photos of a petrified > dinosaur foot embedded in slate. > > >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z3dino.jpg >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/Dfoot.jpg >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossil/MVC-039S.JPG < >>>=========================================== < >> >>PECULIAR SPECIMEN > > < > Another specimen of petrified bone embedded in slate: > < > >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/inslate1.jpg >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/inslate5.jpg > > < > The original Easter bunny? Then, again, it might be the head > of a petrified jackass. And, IF it is, it would be rather appropriate. > < > The Scientific Establishment -- led by its worldwide brood of > arrogant, defiant tenured fossils -- has long been treating > John Q. Public, and his kids, like a jackass, promoting fairy tales > and molesting truth. > < > Over the past 22 years, it has engaged in deceit, deception, collusion > and conspiracy -- of MONUMENTAL proportions -- and one of the > ringleaders has been the Smithsonian Institution. > < > >>================================================ >>================================================ > > > And here's my final thought (one picture should be worth > a thousand words): > < > >>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-001S.JPG >> > No question, members of the scientific establishment academia > -- professors, students and alumni -- have long been fearful > of me and my discoveries because of the dire consequences > they realize that truth would bring. > < > And well they should have been because now that time has > come. They're finally being put in their place and recognized > for the total disgrace to science that they've been. > < > NOW they're not just *afraid* of Ed Conrad. They're terrified! > < > Ed Conrad > >> http://www.edconrad.com >> > > MAN AS OLD AS COAL > and > PROOF OF LIFE AFTER DEATH > >>====================================== > > . > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<chnaqt$nsa$1@info4.fnal.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!info4.fnal.gov!not-for-mailReferences:
<f8rtj01pg0dj6aqa31j2ejtsuad9l8kkgp@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f44bc,f480a19fb9fb69db X-Google-Thread: 10e378,f480a19fb9fb69db X-Google-Thread: 10dad2,f480a19fb9fb69db X-Google-Thread: fcca9,f480a19fb9fb69db X-Google-Attributes: gidf44bc,gid10e378,gid10dad2,gidfcca9,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!info4.fnal.gov!not-for-mail From: EjP <nospam@hackers.are.bad> Newsgroups: sci.skeptic,alt.talk.creationism,soc.retirement,dc.smithsonian Subject: Re: Why, SMITHSONIAN Even Lies to Congressmen... Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 11:12:45 -0500 Organization: Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Lines: 1198 Message-ID: <chnaqt$nsa$1@info4.fnal.gov> References: <f8rtj01pg0dj6aqa31j2ejtsuad9l8kkgp@4ax.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: bdps16-laptop.fnal.gov Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: info4.fnal.gov 1094659741 24458 131.225.129.35 (8 Sep 2004 16:09:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@fnnews.fnal.gov NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 Sep 2004 16:09:01 GMT User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <f8rtj01pg0dj6aqa31j2ejtsuad9l8kkgp@4ax.com>