🚀 go-pugleaf

On Aug 5, 1:17 pm, "Martha Adams" <mh...@verizon.net> wrote:
> <falcon....@live.com> wrote in message
>
> news:c738ccc5-6e16-4dc1-aa92-fb3ee15af214@v39g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
>
> > what what a couple of losers
> > little alan erskine and
> > little marty wallace & assoc.
> > are bucause they making
> > harassing Ku Klux Klan phone
> > calls with obscene, threatening
> > language, heavy breathing,
> > silence and with the words
> > Ku Klux Klan, niger, fuck, dick,
> > suck, pussy, shit, gay,
> > ass, ANIMAL SEX and
> > alot of other words i
> > don't want to post
> > BECAUSE I AM A CHRISTIAN.
>
> Well!  Now I know what a CHRISTIAN is like.
>
> Titeotwawki -- mha  [2008 Aug 05]

Hyde Park in London has a long tradition of free speech - since the
Public Parks act of 1872. There is a speaker's corner there and by
British tradition, anyone can say nearly anything they like and have
an audience.

Now, when speakers discussed subjects that the authorities would
rather not have discussed, because of this tradition, they found it
difficult to just go out an arrest someone - due to public backlash.
So, authorities developed less direct methods to end the discussion of
those they'd rather not have speak freely.  This included baiting the
speakers with angry audience members.  Sometimes two people would be
planted in the audience and one would use foul language, shouting
obsenities at the top of their lungs.  Another would shout back, if
they couldn't get the speaker engaged.  They might even have fights,
or pick pockets of other audience members, anything to draw the
attention of police and cause the speaker to be arrested, turned out,
or otherwise shut up - for reasons OTHER than his or her speaking.
Even if the speakers are not arrested or deterred from speaking - the
audience frequently was!   A Victorian gentleman or lady might listen
to a speech, but when disrupted by hooligans shouting obscenities, it
put a bad light on the whole proceeding - and many otherwise
interested parties, just moved on.

In the modern era thse techniques go by the term 'ratfucking' - modern
information wafere techniques carry it to the next level.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ratfucking
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_warfare

Now, the internet is turning into an electronic global version of Hyde
Park in the 21st century.  It must be discussion of controlled
information is monitored in this venue, and when such information
iroutinely puts controlled information at risk of disclosure, methods
must be used to reduce that risk.  What better techniques to use than
those that have proven so effective at Hyde Park in the Victorian
era?

Is it reasonable to think that this low sci.space.policy group is the
subject of info war techniques?   Well, if it becomes a vehicle for
the global disimination of missile technology - by law the US
government and other signers of the Missile Technology Control Regime
MUST act to cut off that channel of information

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missile_Technology_Control_Regime

ditto for nuclear and other restricted technolgies.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classified_information


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_proliferation