🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sep 5, 12:38 pm, Eric Chomko <pne.cho...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Sep 5, 2:35 am, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 29, 5:20 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 28, 2:01 pm, Robert Casey <wa2...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Victor Smootbank wrote:
> > > > > I think humans are not allowed to travel to the realms
> > > > > of GOD!!!
>
> > > > If God wanted us to fly rockets and probes into space, he'd have given
> > > > us enough brains to design and build such spacecraft....   :-)
>
> > > That's true, as not even those smart Jewish Third Reich wizards could
> > > get us to/from our own moon without each of their butt-cheeks flapping
> > > all the way to/from that certain private guano island.
> > > - Brad Guth
>
> > As I said, and I'll say it again and again;  we haven't walked on that
> > physically dark and nasty moon of ours, at least not with our moonsuit
> > butts of frail DNA and radiation sensitive Kodak film that somehow
> > recorded Earth but never a Venus that was sufficiently nearby and
> > simply brighter than Earth.
>
> What!?! The Earth was less bright being 240,000 miles away from the
> Moon than the slightly smaller Venus which is 100 times as far?! And
> THAT is assuming inferior conjunction WRT the Earth and Venus.

That is correct, in that the given albedo of Venus, though a small
crescent item in optical/FOV size, was in fact pixel per pixel or
rather that of an unfiltered Kodak moment grain per grain brighter
than Earth item.  That's not even rocket science, and lo and behold it
has been replicated to death, even by NASA standards of having
recorded our moon within the very same FOV and given amount of image
exposure, whereas Venus was clearly depicted as much brighter than our
physically dark and nasty moon.

Remember that we're not talking about a given point-source of light.

So, where's Venus hiding when NASA/Apollo was playing their
perpetrated cold-war games of their supposedly rad-hard walking on the
moon?

You can use your fully interactive 3D orbital simulator to exactly
locate Venus as viewed from the moon, and for using a 45 degree FOV
should be good enough.  Don't forget about the nifty 4 kw/m2 of peak
solar spectrum energy that the reflective albedo of Venus had to work
with, and the matter of fact of such Kodak film being extremely
sensitive to that portion of the raw solar spectrum.
- Brad Guth -