🚀 go-pugleaf

On Apr 26, 7:10 pm, The Ghost In The Machine
<e...@sirius.tg00suus7038.net> wrote:
>
> > Of at least two previous postings as being missing in action, I see
> > that your GOOGLE/Usenet has been into stealth moderating/excluding of
> > my stuff again.  Why is that?
>
> Say what?

Say double what yourself!
You've got to be kidding, suggesting that you don't don't have an
honest clue.

>
> I respond when I choose to respond.  You use Google; I use TeraNews.
> Obviously you've not yet mastered the intricacies of the
> store/forward/publish/subscribe system that is UseNet.

Why don't you pretend that you're a willing mass murderer (like our
resident LLPOF warlord), at least then you'd sound a whole lot more
believable.  At least I'm telling the God's truth about how my poor
old PC is getting summarily nailed by your kind, though how about
yourself?

>
> > Why are the mostly Jewish folks of this infomercial spewing Usenet so
> > deathly afraid of their own shadows?
>
> Why are you so afraid of those who profess the Jewish faith?
> Are they that dangerous with their yarmulkes and three-piece suits?
>
> (Disclaimer: I'm an atheist.)

But all MI/NSA rusemasters are "atheist", though otherwise 100+% pro-
Jewish at the very same time, and otherwise unlike most others you
must be thinking about, whereas I'm not afraid of those mostly Jewish
shadows.  Where did I ever once give such notions of my being afraid
of those mostly Jewish MIB?

>
> > Why are the faith-based of such little faith, especially of your born-
> > again LLPOF species?
>
> An intelligent question!

Then how about offering us an intelligent answer to that intelligent
question?  Or, are you afraid to say anything that might rock your
mostly Jewish/atheist boat?

>
> > Why haven't you folks constructively contributed as to the topic at
> > hand, such as with those hard scientific numbers?
>
> More like napkin calculation parameters in my case.  I suppose I could
> look up the Russian missions and calculate a more precise value for the
> amount of propellant/energy required.  I'm not sure there's much point.

But you folks have access to those spendy supercomputers, and of their
fully interactive software driven simulators.

That's true because, their proposed manned lunar mission was demanding
of an impressive 5 stage effort, incorporating less GLOW worth of
inert mass, of roughly more than twice the rocket/payload ratio, and
for that effort taking longer to get there.

Notice how there's no such documentation as to any USSR/Russian fly-by-
rocket lander R&D, that which even relates to whatever supposedly was
doable on behalf of their robotic efforts.  Didn't those Russians know
that movie film existed at the time?  Didn't they know of how to drop-
test and otherwise safely down-range proof-test and thereby improve
upon any such prototype fly-by-rocket lander (especially of one demand
so much AI capability), exactly like how they too still can't
demonstrate squat as of today.

>
> > Where's all of your all-knowing science and physics that fits into
> > this mold of Mars w/o salt, and of Earth with way more than its fair
> > share of salt (including that of our salty moon)?
>
> > You're all dancing around in the nude, arnt you.
>
> I'd like to know where you get the notion that:
>
> [a] the Moon is salty, and
> [b] Mars is not.

I've been there and having done just that.  Which isolated off-world
location are you folks speaking from, or rather pretending as being
from?

Are you sitting in a UFO that hasn't been anywhere near Earth for the
past seven years?

>
> Especially since there are so many forms of salts, especially if one
> goes into the organic realm.  One salt, for instance, is baking soda;
> it's a combination of sodium and the acid/ketone (HO)2C=O, which is
> close to formic acid (HCOOH) and oxalic acid (COOH)2, but isn't
> either one.

That's true, and I'll gladly take any or all of those above salts into
consideration, and then some, along with whatever's of common sea
salt.  However, Mars is essentially an old and cold to the core worth
of planetology w/o salt(s), and yet our extremely large and unusually
massive moon that's orbiting so nearby still has more than its fair
share of those pesky salt(s) to spare.  Go figure otherwise.

When are you folks ever going to run that supercomputer simulator on
behalf of easily locating Venus and a few other items within the DR of
those NASA/Apollo Kodak moments?

Oops! once a liar always a liar.  Sorry I'd asked for what's
impossible for you folks to accommodate, and still remain alive as to
savor upon those Kodak moments of truth.
-
Brad Guth