🚀 go-pugleaf

Cardinal Chunder wrote:
> >What's your expertice or best available swag that's related to this
> > topic?
: What topic would that be kook?
How about this Usenet that sucks and blows, or the fuckology of folks
like yourself screwing humanity and our environment at the same time?

> > What's your naysay/yaysay as to Venusian ETs or of any other
> > intelligent ETs
: There is zero hard evidence to support Venusian ETs, let alone any
other
: kind. That doesn't stop you bleating about the latest jpeg
compression
: artifact you think is actually a building. Or something.

That's not exactly on topic as to what I'd asked, now is it.  I never
said that there was hard-evidence, just that there was the best
evidence yet of something extremely intelligent looking and otherwise
technically doable.  However, if you don't like ETs, I do believe that
nifty 'fluid arch' is actually good enough to discuss.
>
> > BTW;  In case you're Jewish.  I have also used the words/names
> > "Catholic", "Islamic", "Muslim" and "Cathar" for way more than my fair
> > share.  So what?  Have I left out your brown-nosed religion or
> > political basis of whatever logic of infomercial-science or
> > disinformation that floats your boat?
> >
> > What's your personal knowledge or best swag as to those NASA/Apollo
> > missions that never transpired according to what we've all been told?
>
> What is so interesting is seeing you, Ed, and Min form some kind of
> unholy kook defence network. Each of you is as batshit insane as the
> other, but in your own unique ways of course.
>
Interesting how your butt-cheeks flap and the flatulence flows whenever
you type or speak.
-
Brad Guth