🚀 go-pugleaf

How typically pathetic, totally arrogant and otherwise bigoted of
yourself.

Robert Weldon wrote:
> "Brad Guth" <ieisbradguth@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1153865156.052199.249200@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
> > Unlike yourself, at least Ed Conrad and I'm certainly not the ones that
> > are into rejecting the regular laws of physics, nor have I been
> > excluding as to various replicated hard-science in order to accommodate
> > some ulterior motives or hidden agenda.  And I sure as hell do not
> > approve of our perpetrated cold-war past (including that bloody 6-Day
> > war) or of what's present day or of the global warming and horrifically
> > extra Muslim bloody future, in so much as we're being taken to the
> > cleaners on behalf of sustaining your resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush)
> > as representing the ultimate born-again bigotry and arrogance of a
> > Third Reich minion as based upon his clear intent as to dominate over
> > the remaining global energy markets before our magnetosphere goes
> > red-line, and subsequently we all get to an early grave because we
> > can't afford the necessary extra-spendy energy and shielding, nor
> > otherwise the protected environment that's getting reserved extensively
> > for accommodating the upper most 0.1% of humanity.
>
> Rejecting regular laws of physics? you make up your own.  And nice word
> salad in your rant, only the best loons can pull that off.
Obviously you can't be specific without calling yourself a liar, or
something far worse.

>
> > At least so far, we humans don't eat jellyfish.
>
> Ok, you completely lost me here
That's OK, because you're a lost cause to start with.

> > How about yourself?  Where exactly do you stand?
> On my two legs.

> > What's your expertice or best available swag that's related to this
> > topic?
>
> To this topic, why, that you and Ed are complete loons.  At least Ed is
> funny, you are apparently completely insane.
In other words, you consider the truth as being loon worthy.

> > What's your naysay/yaysay as to Venusian ETs or of any other
> > intelligent ETs?
>
> Until I see hard evidence of any ETs, I am reserving judgement.  By the way,
> nothing you have posted do I consider hard evidence.
Since you obviously don't believe in pictures nor in the regular laws
of physics, nor even in replicated science, therefore what exactly
would you consider as "hard evidence"?

> > BTW;  In case you're Jewish.  I have also used the words/names
> > "Catholic", "Islamic", "Muslim" and "Cathar" for way more than my fair
> > share.  So what?  Have I left out your brown-nosed religion or
> > political basis of whatever logic of infomercial-science or
> > disinformation that floats your boat?

> No problem, the closest description of my leanings is atheist.
> >
> > What's your personal knowledge or best swag as to those NASA/Apollo
> > missions that never transpired according to what we've all been told?

> The evidence shows that they did occur.
Since there's no believable photographs or even a viable fly-by-rocket
lander to go by;  please specify whatever it is that you've accepted as
"evidence".
-
Brad Guth