Article View: sci.space.policy
Article #213Re: Follow-up to "The End of Canadians in Space?"
From: ken M Bendelier
Date: Thu, 04 May 1995 00:00
Date: Thu, 04 May 1995 00:00
88 lines
5594 bytes
5594 bytes
Mike Steele (msteele@freenet.niagara.com) wrote: : : Days, not years. The big economic benefits, the things which will affect : : everybody to some extent in our lifetimes, will come about from activities : : in Earth orbit, stable points (called libration points) between the Earth : : and the Moon, and maybe on the Moon itself. You can get to the Moon at a : : leisurely cruise in a few days. : When will I get to the moon in a few days? How much $$$$$$ do I : need to spend before it's going to cost me a forutne to buy a ticket and : rent a room? How much might it cost your grandchild not to be able to get to the moon or beyond? : : : : |> Oh, come on now! How can it help Canada's situation? Let see : : |> some facts, some sort of study! All I can see is a programme to eat at : : |> our debt (anything that wastes the nation's money affects the debt. : : |> That's what the debt is), with NO ECONOMIC OR SOCIAL GAIN/BENEFITS for : : |> years to come. With no gain, it certainly can't help the Canada's : : |> situation (and please don't explaing to me how a moon rock will solve the : : |> welfar problem). : : Brave words, in caps yet! Let's see ... Canada, like Australia, has : : a large land area with a relatively sparse population - most people : : live in cities, long distances between folks in the wilderness areas. : : Both countries have major debt problems. : : FACT: Australia spends about $700 million a year on space-related goods : : and services. Australia's population is pushing 18 million. It's : : likely the value of space business will scale up roughly with the : : population because of the similarities between the two countries : : (mostly to do with distance, resource management, mining activity, : : a general need to know about the weather for agriculture, disaster : : preparation, you name it ...) : : That money winds up in foreign (American, Chinese, European) pockets. : : Why? Because those places were smart enough to invest in space research, : : which allowed these businesses to come into existence. This means jobs : : for their people, tax money for their treasuries. : : Our country benefits as well. People who work for the importing : : companies pay taxes, as do those companies (to some extent!). The : : things those companies do make money (or they'd go out of business). : : They spend this money on other goods and services, increasing the : : general level of economic activity, and the government manages to : : scoop off some at every turn. We just lose out on the jobs, the : : wholesale industries ... : : The net result is that our society (both government and private) makes : : money out of space activities. The downside is that our balance of : : payments is shot to hell. If we did the research, owned the businesses, : : that wouldn't be a problem; there'd be more jobs for our people, more : : money all round. The same applies to Canada. : : That's just today's space business, from yesterday's space research : : and development. There's every reason to think that future space : : research and development will create even more opportunities, make : : us all richer, in terms of both money and quality of life. : I believe in funding research for satelittes, space stations, manned : voyages to the moon, and unmanned voyages to planets in our solar system. : These missions are relatively cheap. I can't understand why a country would : want to waste so much money, however, on manned voyages and the like to : placesother than the moon, when we can't feasibly produce a habitate : (other than a cramped space station) to begin with. There would be a big "yet" involved in your hypothesis. I am thankful you were not one of Isabella's or Ferdinand's advisors about 500 years ago. Else, you wouldn't be here expousing your opinion. : Maybe this is the wrong thread for me to complain in. Is Canada : talkng about cutting back funding to deep space exploration, or the : smaller missions I mentioned above? Let's go forward, where we have the people who can do so. : I feel like an ass, I think I've beena arguing about the wrong : thing for a long time now. Finally, you see the light. Ken : : -- : Mike Steele | St. Catharines -- Canada's Canal City : msteele@freenet.niagara.com | Go Leafs!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<D81C1C.AM6@cs.dal.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<D7ro97.2Ex@freenet.carleton.ca> <sdecont2-0205951410530001@47.73.4.48> <D7yy6E.FGH@freenet.niagara.com> <3o93cd$edt@fdcap2.ap.dg.com> <D80z8z.oA@freenet.niagara.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 14065a,2e0314170c610b91 X-Google-Attributes: gid14065a,public X-Google-Thread: 114c3a,2e0314170c610b91 X-Google-Attributes: gid114c3a,public X-Google-Thread: 10445c,2e0314170c610b91 X-Google-Attributes: gid10445c,public X-Google-Thread: 10e6d0,2e0314170c610b91 X-Google-Attributes: gid10e6d0,public X-Google-Thread: fb374,2e0314170c610b91 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb374,public X-Google-Thread: 1226a2,2e0314170c610b91 X-Google-Attributes: gid1226a2,public From: ken@ug.cs.dal.ca (ken M Bendelier) Subject: Re: Follow-up to "The End of Canadians in Space?" Date: 1995/05/04 Message-ID: <D81C1C.AM6@cs.dal.ca> X-Deja-AN: 102025639 sender: usenet@cs.dal.ca (USENET News) references: <D7ro97.2Ex@freenet.carleton.ca> <sdecont2-0205951410530001@47.73.4.48> <D7yy6E.FGH@freenet.niagara.com> <3o93cd$edt@fdcap2.ap.dg.com> <D80z8z.oA@freenet.niagara.com> organization: Math, Stats & CS, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada newsgroups: sci.space.policy,can.politics,can.schoolnet.space.sr,can.schoolnet.phys.sr,can.schoolnet.eng.sr,can.schoolnet.chat.students.sr