🚀 go-pugleaf

On 24 Oct, 18:45, Wolfgang Wildeblood <wolfgangwildebl...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Oct 24, 10:35 pm, Ian Parker <ianpark...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 18 Oct, 23:23, Peter Lucas <tam...@bigstring.com> wrote:
>
> > > You little fairy faggots are totally pathetic.You are childish,
> > > witless, stupid and repetative. There is not one post on this entire
> > > group that looks like it came from anyone who has more IQ points than
> > > teeth.
>
> > > Revenge? What a fucking joke! You wouldnt know how to get revenge on
> > > anyone. You poor deluded little arseholes. rename the group to Potty-
> > > Mouth
> > > kindergarten you morons. What a bunch of ineffective jerk offs.
>
> > > Shit, I wish people wouldnt let their kids have access to computers
> > > without supervision.
>
> > > I'll leave you here to lick each others slimy little arses and suck
> > > each others tiny little cocks.
>
> > > It was a waste of time coming here. Bye shit eaters, don't forget to
> > > watch sesame street in the morning.
>
> > > Some of you might get to experience firsthand the difference between
> > > Aikido and a real martial art.
>
> > > I don't give up, I don't go away, I just get angrier and angrier until
> > > I get to feel bones breaking in the arseholes that are pissing me
> > > off.
>
> > > You laugh and feel smug now but I PROMISE you, all pricks that
> > > crossposted are going to feel MAJOR pain.
>
> > > I already know where one of you is, you have already had an ISP track
> > > you down for something else. I got that info shit for brains and I'm
> > > going to use it.
>
> > > Laugh now cos you sure as fuck wont laugh later.
>
> > > You want to know why I got the nickname Psycho? Because I went to jail
> > > for biting a guys finger off after he gave me the finger in traffic.
>
> > > I followed him for thirty miles before I got the cowardly little
> > > arsehole.
>
> > > You dipshits have pised me off a fucking sight more than he did."
>
> > > --
> > > Peter Lucas
> > > Russell Island
> > > Brisbane
> > > Australia
>
> > > "Life is not like a box of chocolates... it's more like a jar of
> > > jalapenos. What you do today... might burn your ass tomorrow."
>
> > Are you surprised? I stopped regularly contributing to this usergroup
> > after a stream of abuse by certain individuals. Fundamentally you
> > cannot be a credible scientific group which pooh poohs related
> > developments such as robotics and AI.
>
> > It was clear to me then, and by Jove it is even clearer now that you
> > cannot have manned expeditions to the Moon/Mars on the basis of
> > present day technology. It is simply going to cost far more than any
> > government, or even group of governments is going to be prepared to
> > pay in these recessionary times.
>
> > If you are going to deem "mad" anyone who advocates any form of future
> > technology you must accept that the Moon and Mars are going to be
> > permanently out of reach for humanity.
>
> > The most severe abuse by Rand Simberg and his girlfriend (I forget her
> > name, let us simply refer to her as Bint Al-Kalbah - the daughter of a
> > bitch) occurred when NASA "went mad" and contributed to the
> > Singularity University. Clearly NASA (and I think ESA as well)
> > appreciate this basic rubic. In fact robotics and AI MUST assume even
> > greater importance as funds are limited.
>
> > What should this group be discussing? Fundamentally I think it should
> > appreciate that NASA/ESA know far far more than they do about what the
> > technological possibilities are. OK certain things, like LISA where
> > there will have to be phase coherence over 5million km represents
> > milestones that can be discussed. Clearly what is required are ideas,
> > perhaps futuristic, that are not going to cost the Earth. A tall
> > order, probably the official NASA/ESA ideas people will come up with
> > the majority of the better ones. Still they need discussing and
> > perhaps someone could just come up with something that the
> > professionals have missed.
>
> > Rand Simberg and Bint Al-kalbah in particular should realise that they
> > were not just attacking me but attacking the NASA top brass and
> > thereby producing a "pathetic" group as you put it.
>
> > It is clear too that space colonies based on present day technology
> > can be little more than a hugely expensive bolt hole for generals and
> > politicians. People have advocated putting a spike on the steering
> > wheel to encourage drivers to drive better. Far from providing
> > generals/politicians with a bolt-hole ways should be found of
> > providing them with spiked steering wheels.
>
> > Everything which I have posted has turned out to be correct, including
> > my comments on the Iraq war.
>
> >http://www.google.co.uk/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENUK247&q=...
>
> > Another comment I made was that the best way to reduce launch costs
> > was to purchase launches from the cheapest source. NASA has now
> > adopted this policy. It is in fact the ONLY sound rational policy.
> > Ideas about novel launch technologies are all unsound. The expendable
> > rocket remains by far and away the cheapest method of access to space.
>
> >   - Ian Parker
>
> Just out of curiosity, Ian... which newsgroup do you think you're
> posting to? Your rant, while interesting (and I did read it all),
> doesn't seem to have much to do with alternative genealogy, Australian
> transvestites, soccer or recreational food cooking.

This was sci.space.policy. I was addressing my remarks to this group.
I was unaware that there was cross posting. I will continue to discuss
largely space issues. I think at this point I should perhaps talk a
little bit about Stephen Hawking and our place in the Universe (long
term).

Hawking is an atheist although he does show an astonishing degree of
faith. Many people viewing what is known as the Fermi Paradox say that
the reason there are no extraterrestrials is because they all destroy
themselves and by implication we will too.

Hawking has a vision of the human race in space, perhaps becoming what
is known as type 3 and playing a significant part in the life of the
Universe, including perhaps the ability to create other universes.

Is this the right vision? Clearly we will need to improve our
technology in a great many areas, not just in terms of space
transportation. Question :- Is sci.space.policy the place to discuss
this vision? Hell no! It ought to be though, my comments that it a
group of right wing backbiters.

Most of its members are idiots. You see what they want is Socialism.
They want a state that is prepared to spend more and more money on
manned expeditions to Mars. They want a right wing military policy but
an economic policy of state control. They are only Tea Party up to a
point. You see a true Tea Party believer, at least in theory, should
be prepared to raise the money to take them to Mars themselves.


  - Ian Parker