🚀 go-pugleaf

excellent quantifications; "BG" will never reply to it, I guess,
although
his statement could refer to raw coal rocks; I'm sure, though, that
there is a tremendous variation in the darkness of seams
of coal!

> For anyone who believes the moon is too dark to wash out stars -
> compare the number of stars you can see on a clear moonless night to
> the number of stars you can see on a night when there's a full moon.

thus:
conjuring scifi is silly; it has always been a haven
of supersillyousness or outright spookery, as per "flatland"
by the ridiculous A.A.Skwared, 4D BS from the British Pyschol.Society
etc., and
the latterday mongering of timespace -- the arbitrary spacialization
of time by means of a diagram, which is supposed to be an *aid*
to comprehension of phasespace, not a "reified" ideal of itself,
per Minkowski's youthful exhuberance.  (y'know,
Minkowski's stuff is really mathematically worthwhile,
otherwise ... "no, please, don't, stop -- mathematics ?!?!")

*a priori* assumptions of megalithic structures on Venus,
like Hoagland's Balls on Mars foolishness,
really requires an actual program o'space to investigate, since
nature is capable of quite awesome geometries (or
'hype-D physiques'); however, that was shotdown with Kennedy & Nixon:
just as with our nuclear energy, we are still using '50s technology
from the planet Marduk (per ScientologyTM .-)

> > You can consider them "multidimensional" beings who exist through time

> the clearly intelligent infrastructure that can be seen as rational
> and existing/coexisting on Venus?

thus:
that which causes the matter of "time slowing"
in acceleration, is really the same as matter being energy,
somehow, via their proportionality with c,
the speed of light; that's incredibly obvious, although
I know of no school of quantum, that says,
how many quants of light make a proton e.g. (and,
since the "photons" come in all sizes, it's moot .-)

in any case, this is one of the properties of light
that was experimentally verified in the 19th cce, although
it is carachteristically never even mentioned,
in favor of one of the EinsteinHubbleGodot paradoxi/
doctrines of the Department of Einsteinmania/
the Musical Department!

thus:
superstringtheory at least gets rid of that point,
from the get-go & without further a-do, even if
it's not just a string, a "one-dimensional object" ...
howsoever it is that matter bends space,
as measured by Gauss for the government of France
in the 19th cce, and experimentally adduced
by the classical Greek geometers, light travels
through this bent medium,  which apparently also
alters the shape of it --  no timespace utterances needed,
it's so very, blatantly bended-up!

Roswell is a big double-entendre from WW2, but you could see that
those who embrace it could go no further.  that is really the gist
of the "Lt.Col. Corso School" of Roswellology, that
virtually *all* of 20th cce science & technology
[http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/]
came out of Corso's very own dyspersal of the pile of crap
that fell out of the sky, there, to "some big corporations;"
mayhap, he also wrote the first press-release -- too bad,
he had to wait til he was at death's door, to reap the deal
for the book.

that is to say,
humans are incapable of generating ideas ... or,
it just applies to Americans!

> > > Einstein was not a hoax, you are. There IS a Roswell hoax, there was

--Seargent Barracks Soros McCheeny Pepper,
"Give jihad a chance in The Sudan, Rhodesia, and
other former colonial moments -- Yahoo!TM;
you're going to feel my computerized draft,
boys'n'girls: NO AMERICAN MIDDLESCHOOLER LEFT BEHIND;
                 NO RHODESIA SCHOLARS IN HARM'S WAY!"
http://larouchepub.com/lar/2008/3526lar_soros_pamph.html
http://larouchepub.com/other/2008/3526save_nations_parasites.html
http://larouchepub.com/other/2008/3526zim_brit_op.html