Article View: sci.space.shuttle
Article #3620Re: Shuttle replacement, STS-52 half-full
From: Michael V. Kent
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 05:40
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 05:40
45 lines
2726 bytes
2726 bytes
In article <69647@cup.portal.com> BrianT@cup.portal.com (Brian Stuart Thorn) writes: >P.S., I consider myself more than mildly supportive of the Space Shuttle, >but when NASA starts flying half-empty Space Shuttles and saying "the mission >was full", I get worried. I was just trying to explain, not defend, NASA's position as I see it. Both ground control and the astronauts claimed that they were very busy and work- ing 12 - 16 hour days. They may not have had the crew time to support an additional payload, I don't know. I do know that payload volume is not the only constraint. I can think of several ways to work around the problem: 1) Launch the LAGEOS on a Delta. This could have been done rather easily, in my opinion. 2) Launch IRIS on another or the same Delta. This would have required a significant development that NASA may have had to pay for. IRIS was developed as an upper stage for Shuttle commercial payloads. After commercial satellites were removed from the manifest, NASA agreed to launch LAGEOS as its first and only IRIS payload. This was probably important for international relations as I suspect, but don't know, that Italy wanted data on what is for it a substantial rocket develop- ment program. Thus IRIS, not just LAGEOS, needed to be flown. 3) Add another astronaut to the crew. If crew time was indeed the constraint as I suspect, that fact should have been obvious early enough to add a- nother astronaut to run the additional payload in the payload bay. 4) Make it an EDO flight. Again, if crew time were the constraint, adding the EDO pallet would add another two man-weeks to the flight. For reasons not obvious to me, NASA is only flying one EDO flight per year. The incremental cost of making a regular Columbia flight an EDO flight is rather low. If it were up to me, Columbia would be flying EDO every flight, even if half of it were nothing but astronauts floating around in LBNPs. Mike -- Michael Kent kentm@rpi.edu McDonnell Douglas Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Tute Screwed Aero Class of '92 Apple II Forever !!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<gpw1tpp@rpi.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gumby!wupost!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!kentmReferences:
<69532@cup.portal.com> <1992Nov15.060518.20381@cs.sfu.ca> <69647@cup.portal.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle,sci.space Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gumby!wupost!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!kentm From: kentm@aix.rpi.edu (Michael V. Kent) Subject: Re: Shuttle replacement, STS-52 half-full Message-ID: <gpw1tpp@rpi.edu> Nntp-Posting-Host: aix.rpi.edu Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY References: <69532@cup.portal.com> <1992Nov15.060518.20381@cs.sfu.ca> <69647@cup.portal.com> Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 05:40:26 GMT Lines: 45