Article View: sci.space.shuttle
Article #3626SSTO Viability (was: Shuttle replacement)
From: Allen W. Sherzer
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 18:10
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 18:10
28 lines
1668 bytes
1668 bytes
In article <1e8qk2INNccc@spock.usc.edu> cbehre@spock.usc.edu (Charles Behre) writes: >What level of success would the DCX testing program have to show to make it a >viable candidate? There are two things which need to be validated. First is the aerodynamics of the 'flip maneuver' they use on re-entry. The second thing is to verify their models and simulations on tasks needed for rapid operations (can the engines be serviced as fast as they think, ect). >Does this program have the ability to fascinate congress and >Al Gore if it demonstrates what it intendend to do? I hope so. We are working hard on that (again, let me know if you want to help). We have shown a few key people that there is support for this. >On the other hand, would a >DCX program shifted to taking on the duties of a HL-20 be a disasterous >move in terms of the programs efficiency? Depends on who executes it and how. Allen -- +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Allen W. Sherzer | "A great man is one who does nothing but leaves | | aws@iti.org | nothing undone" | +----------------------158 DAYS TO FIRST FLIGHT OF DCX----------------------+
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov17.181045.29655@iti.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!hela.iti.org!awsReferences:
<s#s1_2@rpi.edu> <BxsG4q.Hq8@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> <1e8qk2INNccc@spock.usc.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle,sci.space Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!hela.iti.org!aws From: aws@iti.org (Allen W. Sherzer) Subject: SSTO Viability (was: Shuttle replacement) Message-ID: <1992Nov17.181045.29655@iti.org> Organization: Evil Geniuses for a Better Tomorrow References: <s#s1_2@rpi.edu> <BxsG4q.Hq8@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> <1e8qk2INNccc@spock.usc.edu> Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 18:10:45 GMT Lines: 28