Article View: sci.space.shuttle
Article #3650Re: SSTO Viability (was: Shuttle replacement)
From: Edward V. Wright
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 20:08
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 20:08
38 lines
2961 bytes
2961 bytes
In <1992Nov17.181045.29655@iti.org> aws@iti.org (Allen W. Sherzer) writes: >There are two things which need to be validated. First is the aerodynamics of >the 'flip maneuver' they use on re-entry. The second thing is to verify >their models and simulations on tasks needed for rapid operations (can the >engines be serviced as fast as they think, ect). The second goal is vastly more important than the first. If the flip manuever proves problematical, the next vehicle could be redesigned to use a more conventional base-first reentry (like Apollo). If the maintenance goals can't be achieved, however, it would undermine the entire justification for the project. >>Does this program have the ability to fascinate congress and >>Al Gore if it demonstrates what it intendend to do? >I hope so. We are working hard on that (again, let me know if you want >to help). We have shown a few key people that there is support for this. Nothing that doesn't have "ecological disaster" in its title has the ability to fascinate Al Gore. However, Milton Freidman used to tell a story about geese and politicians. If you watch a flock of geese, flying in "V" formation behind the leader, everyone once in a while you will see them start to head in the wrong direction. The other geese, realizing something's wrong, turn and continue in the correct direction. Finally the "leader" turns his head, realizes no one is following him, and starts to flap like mad to get in front of everybody else again. Politicians operate much the same way. The critical test, I think, is public opinion. If the American people get really excited about this, Clinton and Gore will quickly move into the "I said it was a good idea all along" camp. That will happen around the time of the first test launch, if it happens at all. When a project goes from zero visibility to the network news, it makes all the difference in the world because most politicians (and most Americans) don't care about anything that doesn't make the network news. (Let's just hope the launch happens on a slow news day.)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ewright.722117294@convex.convex.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!emory!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!news.oc.com!convex!ewrightReferences:
<s#s1_2@rpi.edu> <BxsG4q.Hq8@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> <1e8qk2INNccc@spock.usc.edu> <1992Nov17.181045.29655@iti.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!emory!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!news.oc.com!convex!ewright
From: ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright)
Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle,sci.space
Subject: Re: SSTO Viability (was: Shuttle replacement)
Message-ID: <ewright.722117294@convex.convex.com>
Date: 18 Nov 92 20:08:14 GMT
Article-I.D.: convex.ewright.722117294
References: <s#s1_2@rpi.edu> <BxsG4q.Hq8@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> <1e8qk2INNccc@spock.usc.edu> <1992Nov17.181045.29655@iti.org>
Sender: usenet@news.eng.convex.com (news access account)
Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
Lines: 38
Nntp-Posting-Host: bach.convex.com
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
not necessarily those of CONVEX.