Article View: sci.space.shuttle
Article #3660Re: SSTO Viability (was: Shuttle replacement)
From: Allen W. Sherzer
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 15:04
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 15:04
43 lines
2480 bytes
2480 bytes
In article <ewright.722117294@convex.convex.com> ewright@convex.com (Edward V. Wright) writes: >The second goal is vastly more important than the first. If the flip >manuever proves problematical, the next vehicle could be redesigned >to use a more conventional base-first reentry (like Apollo). Agreed but with one minor nit. The flip maneuver allows DC to use existing conventional bell nozzles. The GD design could enter base first but had to have an aerospike nozzle to do it. Since aerospike nozzles have never flown, that would add another risk to the propulsion system. >Nothing that doesn't have "ecological disaster" in its title has >the ability to fascinate Al Gore. Hmmm... this gives me an idea. Maybe the way to sell SSTO to Gore is to emphasize the non-poluting fuel it uses. Deltas and Titans burn nasty stuff which wold cause problems in large quantities. >However, Milton Freidman used to tell a story about geese and politicians... >[story deleted] >The critical test, I think, is public opinion. If the American >people get really excited about this, Clinton and Gore will quickly >move into the "I said it was a good idea all along" camp. Exactly! And we need to let them do it and thank them for it. >When a project goes from zero visibility to the network news, it makes >all the difference in the world because most politicians (and most >Americans) don't care about anything that doesn't make the network >news. (Let's just hope the launch happens on a slow news day.) We need to do other things as well. There was an article on this in a recent issue of Design News and the British newspaper The Guardian is also working on an article. Allen -- +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Allen W. Sherzer | "A great man is one who does nothing but leaves | | aws@iti.org | nothing undone" | +----------------------156 DAYS TO FIRST FLIGHT OF DCX----------------------+
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov19.150400.24961@iti.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!hela.iti.org!awsReferences:
<1e8qk2INNccc@spock.usc.edu> <1992Nov17.181045.29655@iti.org> <ewright.722117294@convex.convex.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle,sci.space Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!hela.iti.org!aws From: aws@iti.org (Allen W. Sherzer) Subject: Re: SSTO Viability (was: Shuttle replacement) Message-ID: <1992Nov19.150400.24961@iti.org> Organization: Evil Geniuses for a Better Tomorrow References: <1e8qk2INNccc@spock.usc.edu> <1992Nov17.181045.29655@iti.org> <ewright.722117294@convex.convex.com> Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 15:04:00 GMT Lines: 43