Article View: sci.space.shuttle
Article #3666Re: Apollo 10 LM (was Re: pre-fire Apollo schedule)
From: Tom A Baker
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 23:36
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 23:36
36 lines
2546 bytes
2546 bytes
In article <ByyGp2.685@zoo.toronto.edu> henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer) writes: >In article <1992Dec8.100407.1@fnala.fnal.gov> higgins@fnala.fnal.gov (Bill Higgins-- Beam Jockey) writes: >>Henry, you imply that Apollo 10's LM couldn't actually land and >>return. Can you elaborate? This is the first I've heard of this. >talks about it. He says that the Apollo 10 LM *probably* could have >flown a lunar landing if some fuel had been offloaded to lighten it, but >the margins would have been slim and hard to predict. It would probably > >So, as actually flown the Apollo 10 LM was indeed a little too heavy. Scary. As I have often recalled, there was a subtle bug in the LM software that flew in the Apollo 10 mission. When in ascent mode, the LM was supposed to automatically stay in contact with the CSM by directional antenna. If it wasn't, then the LM automatically would do a "random tumble" to locate it. During Apollo 10's simulation of ascent, that started happening just at the beginning of the simulated ascent. Stafford yelled "Son of a bitch!", which we all heard on Earth a while before we found out the problem. I am not saying that would have happened (noflamesplease) as it is probable that the CSM *would* be locked in, and the LM commander would be manually overriding more tightly than Stafford was. But it does point up the extra risks of a "let's do it this time and surprise the russians" landing that might have been tried. (By the way, I remember discussing this with my circle at the time of the flight; at that point, the space race still seemed real.) tombaker --------------------------------------.-------------------------------------- Net - tombaker@world.std.com __ | National Space Society is a nonprofit uucp - uunet!world!tombaker / \ / | public organization dedicated to BIX - tombaker / O / | promoting the eventual establishment AOL - TABaker@aol.com / \__/ | of a spacefaring civilization. ______________________________________|______________________________________
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Bz9w8J.6Lv@world.std.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!world!tombakerReferences:
<Byx2H4.8CB@zoo.toronto.edu> <1992Dec8.100407.1@fnala.fnal.gov> <ByyGp2.685@zoo.toronto.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle,sci.space Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!world!tombaker From: tombaker@world.std.com (Tom A Baker) Subject: Re: Apollo 10 LM (was Re: pre-fire Apollo schedule) Message-ID: <Bz9w8J.6Lv@world.std.com> Organization: Me, at The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA References: <Byx2H4.8CB@zoo.toronto.edu> <1992Dec8.100407.1@fnala.fnal.gov> <ByyGp2.685@zoo.toronto.edu> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 23:36:18 GMT Lines: 37