Re: STS-1 Disaster -- follow-up #2

Article View: sci.space.shuttle

Article #3685

#3685

From: JKF
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1992 06:00

19 lines
1600 bytes

In article <SHAFER.92Dec23213122@ra.dfrf.nasa.gov> shafer@rigel.dfrf.nasa.gov (Mary Shafer) writes:
>On Wed, 23 Dec 92 02:22:37 GMT, dnadams@nyx.cs.du.edu (Dean Adams) said:
>
> >NO SHUTTLE GROUND LAUNCHES WERE SECRET.  LAUNCHES FROM A 747, AT 
> >35,000 FEET OR SO, WOULD *NOT* BE EASY TO SEE.
>
>Dean> Right, they would be IMPOSSIBLE to see, since NO such capability exists.
>
>Er, Dean, we did launch the Enterprise from the 747 at altitude.
>It was quite easy to see, too.  I saw it all five times.

Which just goes to show that Mary Shafer is also a member of the
conspiracy, else she would not go to such desperate lengths to try to
explain away NASA's horrible LIES.

Yes, Mary Shafer and all members of the NASA/Bolshevik/Krystal's/NACA
conspiracy are in this together, controlled by their true masters...

the lemurs.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Dec26.060011.13613@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mnemosyne.cs.du.edu!nyx!jfurr

References: <1h3059INNq8n@news.cerf.net> <1992Dec23.022237.25606@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <SHAFER.92Dec23213122@ra.dfrf.nasa.gov>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle,alt.conspiracy,talk.politics.misc
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mnemosyne.cs.du.edu!nyx!jfurr
From: jfurr@nyx.cs.du.edu (JKF)
Subject: Re: STS-1 Disaster -- follow-up #2
Message-ID: <1992Dec26.060011.13613@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
 of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
 control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Sender: usenet@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu (netnews admin account)
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
References: <1h3059INNq8n@news.cerf.net> <1992Dec23.022237.25606@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <SHAFER.92Dec23213122@ra.dfrf.nasa.gov>
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 92 06:00:11 GMT
Lines: 21

Reply to Parent Message