Article View: sci.space.shuttle
Article #3771Re: Answer to 104%/109% Thrust Quest.
From: Henry Spencer
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 23:51
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 23:51
13 lines
1211 bytes
1211 bytes
In article <1992Nov19.175804.29085@news.duc.auburn.edu> forrepr@eng.auburn.edu writes:
>I see now why I'm not a linguist. What I meant with the above question
>is why aren't all three SSMEs throttled to 109% nominally ??
>i.e. - off the pad and through MECO (with the exception of Max Q throttle-down)
It's considered somewhat hard on the engines. Originally the engines were
to be qualified for only a small number of 109% cycles in their lifetime,
strictly for emergencies. There were later moves toward clearing them
for fewer and fewer limitations on 109% power, but after Challenger
some doubts were raised about this, and current missions use only 104%.
--
MS-DOS is the OS/360 of the 1980s. | Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
-Hal W. Hardenbergh (1985)| henry@zoo.toronto.edu utzoo!henry
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BxzM9D.5qx@zoo.toronto.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!utcsri!utgpu!utzoo!henryReferences:
<4032@phred.UUCP> <1992Nov19.175804.29085@news.duc.auburn.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!utcsri!utgpu!utzoo!henry From: henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer) Subject: Re: Answer to 104%/109% Thrust Quest. Message-ID: <BxzM9D.5qx@zoo.toronto.edu> Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 23:51:10 GMT References: <4032@phred.UUCP> <1992Nov19.175804.29085@news.duc.auburn.edu> Organization: U of Toronto Zoology Lines: 13