Article View: sci.space.shuttle
Article #3947Re: Things aint so bad
From: Henry Spencer
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 1987 00:19
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 1987 00:19
24 lines
1567 bytes
1567 bytes
> How does the Mir compare with Skylab, besides the obvious fact that we no
> longer have Skylab.
Roughly speaking:
1. Mir is quite a bit smaller than Skylab. Necessarily so, it was launched
by a rather smaller booster.
2. Mir has four docking ports earmarked for future expansion plus two used
for routine operations, where Skylab had one plus an emergency spare.
(It did have expansion ports originally, but lost them later in its
development when it became clear that they would never be used.)
3. Mir has a propulsion system used to reboost it periodically, Skylab didn't.
4. Mir is designed to be resupplied in space, Skylab was not (for lack of a
suitable cargo vehicle and because, again, it was clear that the
capability would never be used).
5. In short, Skylab was a one-shot while Mir is the nucleus of an ongoing
space-station project.
--
"There's a lot more to do in space | Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
than sending people to Mars." --Bova | {allegra,ihnp4,decvax,utai}!utzoo!henry
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8621@utzoo.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henryReferences:
<13312@amdahl.amdahl.com> <7973@think.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henry From: henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer) Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle,sci.space Subject: Re: Things aint so bad Message-ID: <8621@utzoo.UUCP> Date: Sat, 19-Sep-87 20:19:02 EDT Article-I.D.: utzoo.8621 Posted: Sat Sep 19 20:19:02 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 19-Sep-87 20:19:02 EDT References: <13312@amdahl.amdahl.com> <7973@think.UUCP> Organization: U of Toronto Zoology Lines: 24