Article View: sci.space.shuttle
Article #3989Re: Throttling the Challenger
From: Stu Cobb
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 1987 06:11
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 1987 06:11
18 lines
1565 bytes
1565 bytes
In article <8796@utzoo.UUCP>, henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer) writes: > Engines, like lightbulbs, generally do not have a single specific setting > for which they are designed, in the sense that all other settings work > poorly or not at all. Sorry, but I don't believe this is true. The Shuttle engine is rather rare in that it can be throttled over almost a 2:1 range. Most rocket engines are, in fact, designed to run at a particular setting. This is primarily because most rocket engines were designed before flexible control systems were available. They use pneumatic/hydraulic/fluidic controls (the pinnacle of late-50's technology) which are fussy about their set-points. This fact is what got the early OSCARs into space. They couldn't throttle down their boosters to match the weight of the primary payload; instead, they had to carry ballast. Don Stoner had the bright idea to carry interesting ballast, which led to the OSCARs. Stu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<201@splut.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!nuchat!sugar!splut!stuReferences:
<340@ablnc.ATT.COM> <3143@ames.arpa>, <6563@ut-ngp.UUCP> <8796@utzoo.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!nuchat!sugar!splut!stu From: stu@splut.UUCP (Stu Cobb) Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle Subject: Re: Throttling the Challenger Message-ID: <201@splut.UUCP> Date: Sat, 24-Oct-87 01:11:34 EST Article-I.D.: splut.201 Posted: Sat Oct 24 01:11:34 1987 Date-Received: Mon, 26-Oct-87 05:48:59 EST References: <340@ablnc.ATT.COM> <3143@ames.arpa>, <6563@ut-ngp.UUCP> <8796@utzoo.UUCP> Organization: Confederate Microsystems, League City, TX Lines: 18 Keywords: Challenger Throttle Summary: thottle settings