Article View: sci.space.shuttle
Article #4022Re: Payload of shuttle flight directly after last Challenger.
From: Phil R. Karn
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1988 16:54
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1988 16:54
25 lines
1663 bytes
1663 bytes
> As for Pu in space, I've never understood how a satelite could use so much > power that it would need a fision reactor insted of photovoltaic cells, and a > battery? Is there a weight problem? Is it a political issue? In addition to experimental applications, nuclear power is used in space in the following situations: 1. Exploration of the outer solar system. Sunlight is too weak to illuminate solar arrays adequately. The waste heat from the radioactive decay of plutonium is also used to keep the electronics warm. (Pioneer, Voyager, Galileo). 2. Exploration of the moon and planetary surfaces. Long periods of darkness also make solar arrays nearly useless. (Apollo ALSEP, Viking. Surveyor and Early ALSEP used solar arrays, but didn't through many lunar nights). 3. Extraordinarily large power requirements, such as the Soviet ocean observation radars that have gotten all the publicity. In my opinion, the safety issue has been greatly overblown. The plutonium is relatively small and very well packaged. Hardly anybody noticed when the Apollo 13 lunar module re-entered the earth's atmosphere and burned up, depositing its plutonium on the bottom of the ocean. Phil
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<927@thumper.bellcore.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!husc6!rutgers!bellcore!faline!thumper!karnReferences:
<347@flatline.UUCP> <1484@boulder.Colorado.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!husc6!rutgers!bellcore!faline!thumper!karn From: karn@thumper.bellcore.com (Phil R. Karn) Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle Subject: Re: Payload of shuttle flight directly after last Challenger. Summary: need for Pu in space Keywords: Pu Message-ID: <927@thumper.bellcore.com> Date: 4 Feb 88 16:54:04 GMT References: <347@flatline.UUCP> <1484@boulder.Colorado.EDU> Organization: Bell Communications Research, Inc Lines: 25