Article View: sci.space.shuttle
Article #5819Re: Building boosters for Magellan
From: Henry Spencer
Date: Mon, 01 May 1989 19:21
Date: Mon, 01 May 1989 19:21
18 lines
1410 bytes
1410 bytes
In article <4356@omepd.UUCP> snidely@inteloa.UUCP (David P. Schneider) writes: >The point made in those discussions is that the IUS is too light for any >but low-cost Hohmann transfer orbits. The random thought is, why not take >1 or more IUSs up on preceeding flights, park them, and then during the >space probe flight, and "stack" them together to make a larger transfer >agent. The official NASA position is that on-orbit assembly is Really Difficult and hence is unacceptable for mission planning. If it was allowed, one wouldn't mess around with IUSes; one would take the payload up on a shuttle and mate it with something like a Centaur launched by expendable. So we're back with the chicken-and-egg problem, again. On-orbit assembly will remain untried, and hence officially Not To Be Relied On, because it's officially Not To Be Relied On and hence nobody can use it. -- Mars in 1980s: USSR, 2 tries, | Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology 2 failures; USA, 0 tries. | uunet!attcan!utzoo!henry henry@zoo.toronto.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1989May1.192130.9268@utzoo.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henryReferences:
<890418-181721-109@Xerox> <10432@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> <4356@omepd.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henry From: henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) Subject: Re: Building boosters for Magellan Message-ID: <1989May1.192130.9268@utzoo.uucp> Organization: U of Toronto Zoology References: <890418-181721-109@Xerox> <10432@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu> <4356@omepd.UUCP> Date: Mon, 1 May 89 19:21:30 GMT