Article View: sci.space.shuttle
Article #6040Re: Extravehicular Mobility Units
From: Henry Spencer
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 1989 05:00
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 1989 05:00
18 lines
1346 bytes
1346 bytes
In article <219@nwnexus.WA.COM> seans@microsoft.UUCP (Sean Shapira) writes: >Would someone familiar with the STS-32 mission plan describe the >contingency which would require use of these "extravehicular mobility >units"? The classic EVA-requiring emergency is being unable to get the cargo bay doors closed properly. There is a hand-crank procedure for emergencies. Various other possibilities arise when deploying one satellite and picking up another. As seen on the Solar Max repair and the Palapa/Westar retrieval, the nifty gadgets don't always work. As seen on the P/W retrieval, the Syncom repair, and the Skylab solar-array deployment, human muscle and simple tools are much more robust in the face of trouble. (As demonstrated by Nelson, brute-force improvisation doesn't always work. As demonstrated by Volkov, sometimes it *does*.) -- 1755 EST, Dec 14, 1972: human | Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology exploration of space terminates| uunet!attcan!utzoo!henry henry@zoo.toronto.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1989Dec15.050003.6460@utzoo.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henryReferences:
<37867@ames.arc.nasa.gov> <219@nwnexus.WA.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henry From: henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) Subject: Re: Extravehicular Mobility Units Message-ID: <1989Dec15.050003.6460@utzoo.uucp> Organization: U of Toronto Zoology References: <37867@ames.arc.nasa.gov> <219@nwnexus.WA.COM> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 89 05:00:03 GMT