Article View: sci.space.shuttle
Article #6082Re: Launch Advisory for 12/18/89 (Forwarded)
From: Robert McGwier
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 1989 16:57
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 1989 16:57
26 lines
1430 bytes
1430 bytes
From article <38442@ames.arc.nasa.gov>, by yee@trident.arc.nasa.gov (Peter E. Yee):
>
> NASA LAUNCH ADVISORY
>
> NASA managers today decided to postpone the STS-32 launch
> until the second week of January, with the earliest possible date
> January 8. Two significant factors in the decision were the
>
> Crippen said the delay will not impact NASA's ability to
> safely retrieve the Long Duration Exposure Facility, and he
>
Sounds an awful lot like famous last words to me. If the thing is tumbling
just a small amount, the arm cannot retrieve it as the thing would torque
the arm right out of its mounts. I am gonna be one unhappy space cadet
if we lose all that data on the effect of atomic oxygen and other nasties
in near earth orbit.
Bob
--
____________________________________________________________________________
My opinions are my own no matter | Robert W. McGwier, N4HY
who I work for! ;-) | CCR, AMSAT, etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<542@idacrd.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!psuvax1!rutgers!njin!princeton!idacrd!macReferences:
<38442@ames.arc.nasa.gov>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!psuvax1!rutgers!njin!princeton!idacrd!mac From: mac@idacrd.UUCP (Robert McGwier) Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle Subject: Re: Launch Advisory for 12/18/89 (Forwarded) Message-ID: <542@idacrd.UUCP> Date: 19 Dec 89 16:57:38 GMT References: <38442@ames.arc.nasa.gov> Organization: idacrd, princeton, nj Lines: 26