Article View: sci.space.shuttle
Article #6157Re: Shuttle Status for 01/26/90 (Forwarded)
From: Henry Spencer
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1990 19:05
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1990 19:05
19 lines
1472 bytes
1472 bytes
In article <6534@celit.fps.com> dave@fps.com (Dave Smith) writes: >This brings a question to mind. Did they build another VAB size building >at Vandenburg, or were they depending on the usually dry weather down here >and planning to assemble in the open? I think the Vandenberg shuttle setup planned to use a scheme similar to what they use for expendables: assembly on the pad, rather than in a separate building. The VAB system really performs better only if launch rate is seriously high. KSC was designed around a possible ultimate Saturn launch rate of 50+ per year, back when rockets were smaller and dreams were larger. It would never have been done that way if planners had known how low the launch rate would be in the end. On-pad assembly doesn't preclude weather protection, although major operations like adding another piece to the stack would probably have to be done only in favorable weather. -- 1972: Saturn V #15 flight-ready| Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology 1990: birds nesting in engines | uunet!attcan!utzoo!henry henry@zoo.toronto.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Jan30.190517.8621@utzoo.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henryReferences:
<41391@ames.arc.nasa.gov> <1287@ispi.UUCP> <1990Jan28.012831.19765@utzoo.uucp> <6534@celit.fps.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henry From: henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) Subject: Re: Shuttle Status for 01/26/90 (Forwarded) Message-ID: <1990Jan30.190517.8621@utzoo.uucp> Organization: U of Toronto Zoology References: <41391@ames.arc.nasa.gov> <1287@ispi.UUCP> <1990Jan28.012831.19765@utzoo.uucp> <6534@celit.fps.com> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 90 19:05:17 GMT