Article View: sci.space.shuttle
Article #6300Re: INTERESTED IN REVIEWS OF CHALLENGER
From: Henry Spencer
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 1990 00:36
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 1990 00:36
17 lines
1235 bytes
1235 bytes
In article <61@newave.UUCP> john@newave.mn.org (John A. Weeks III) writes: >I am still disappointed that NASA (managers) did not recogize that booster >leakage could lead to a mission failure. They seemed to know that there >was a problem with booster leakage, but they were not worried enough about >the problem to stop launching. The best way to avoid this would be to occasionally fly with a passenger, picked at random from among NASA and contractor managers. Then we wouldn't hear any of this nonsense about "take off your engineering hat and put on your management hat". Unfortunately, there are no plans to do that. Moving (ex-)astronauts into management is not nearly as good, but at least NASA has managed to do some of that. -- MSDOS, abbrev: Maybe SomeDay | Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology an Operating System. | uunet!attcan!utzoo!henry henry@zoo.toronto.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Mar4.003637.13575@utzoo.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henryReferences:
<18626.25e9591a@merrimack.edu> <61@newave.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henry From: henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) Subject: Re: INTERESTED IN REVIEWS OF CHALLENGER Message-ID: <1990Mar4.003637.13575@utzoo.uucp> Organization: U of Toronto Zoology References: <18626.25e9591a@merrimack.edu> <61@newave.UUCP> Date: Sun, 4 Mar 90 00:36:37 GMT