Article View: sci.space.shuttle
Article #6419Re: Stupid Math tricks (was Re: Zeno's Paradox)
From: jon murray
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 1997 00:00
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 1997 00:00
23 lines
1581 bytes
1581 bytes
William Chops Westfield wrote: > > Which is the larger set of numbers: All positive integers, or all integers? > Both are infinity, but is one set twice as large as the other? > > They're the same size. The set of all rational number (fractions) is > the same size too. But the set of irrational numbers is bigger... > > That should be obvious. > Well, not being a mathematitian, it isn't obvious to me. Is there any imaginable situation where my lack of insight is likely to cause me a problem? Jon ********* My address has been spam-protected. It's 'netconnect' & I live in Australia (.au) *********
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<33581A1D.54D2@nextconnect.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<858944975.21700@dejanews.com> <E7pGE8.21v@watserv3.uwaterloo.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 102cdf,685ba1a60412cd32 X-Google-Attributes: gid102cdf,public X-Google-Thread: 10a148,685ba1a60412cd32 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a148,public X-Google-Thread: ffd1b,685ba1a60412cd32 X-Google-Attributes: gidffd1b,public X-Google-Thread: f5d40,685ba1a60412cd32 X-Google-Attributes: gidf5d40,public X-Google-Thread: 10f3ae,685ba1a60412cd32 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f3ae,public X-Google-Thread: 10aec3,685ba1a60412cd32 X-Google-Attributes: gid10aec3,public From: jon murray <jonm@nextconnect.com> Subject: Re: Stupid Math tricks (was Re: Zeno's Paradox) Date: 1997/04/19 Message-ID: <33581A1D.54D2@nextconnect.com> X-Deja-AN: 235828012 References: <858944975.21700@dejanews.com> <E7pGE8.21v@watserv3.uwaterloo.ca> Reply-To: jonm@nextconnect.com Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle,alt.conspiracy,alt.folklore.science,hsv.general,alt.folklore.urban,rec.models.rockets