Article View: sci.space.shuttle
Article #6422Re: Zeno's Paradox (was Re: Moonlanding was FAKE...)
From: The Silent Observer
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 1997 00:00
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 1997 00:00
38 lines
2767 bytes
2767 bytes
Russ Jones wrote: > > On Fri, 18 Apr 1997, Drew Lawson wrote: > > > > > In article <5j4pis$3ka$1@nnrp01.primenet.com>, John Gentile > > <bbobb@primenet.com> wrote: > > > > > infinity is the highest number (usually), and there is no > > > highest number, so infinity does not exist. > > > > Please seek therapy from a qualified mathematician. > > > Which is the larger set of numbers: All positive integers, or all integers? > Both are infinity, but is one set twice as large as the other? > According to my college calculus teacher, they're equal in size. Both are "countably infinite" -- as opposed to the larger, "uncountably infinite" set of the rational numbers, and the still larger set of the real numbers. In each case, there are an infinite number of members of one set between each two members of the previous. The rule, in my mind, has always been "you have to square infinity to make it any bigger." -- A confidence man knows he's lying; that limits his scope. But a successful shaman believes what he says -- and belief is contagious; there is no limit to >his< scope. -- Jubal Harshaw, M.D, J.D. Donald Qualls, aka The Silent Observer NAR # 70141-SR Insured silent1@ix.netcom.com http://members.aol.com/silntobsvr/home.htm Rocket Pages http://members.aol.com/silntobsvr/modrocs.htm Opinions expressed are my own -- take them for what they're worth and don't expect them to be perfect.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<33588B2B.4418@ix.netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<858944975.21700@dejanews.com> <E7pGE8.21v@watserv3.uwaterloo.ca> <hatunenE7pK18.n1L@netcom.com> <5he5lg$hs8@flood.weeg.uiowa.edu> <5heubn$r3v@gap.cco.caltech.edu> <5hhq2q$fr1@usenet.rpi.edu> <5j4pis$3ka$1@nnrp01.primenet.com> <dlawson-1804970653040001@news2.aimnet.com> <Pine.HPP.3.91.970418125337.19713E-100000@pwic045.ks.boeing.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 102cdf,685ba1a60412cd32 X-Google-Attributes: gid102cdf,public X-Google-Thread: ffd1b,685ba1a60412cd32 X-Google-Attributes: gidffd1b,public X-Google-Thread: 10aec3,685ba1a60412cd32 X-Google-Attributes: gid10aec3,public X-Google-Thread: 10a148,685ba1a60412cd32 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a148,public X-Google-Thread: 10f3ae,685ba1a60412cd32 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f3ae,public X-Google-Thread: f5d40,685ba1a60412cd32 X-Google-Attributes: gidf5d40,public From: The Silent Observer <silent1@ix.netcom.com> Subject: Re: Zeno's Paradox (was Re: Moonlanding was FAKE...) Date: 1997/04/19 Message-ID: <33588B2B.4418@ix.netcom.com> X-Deja-AN: 235925639 References: <858944975.21700@dejanews.com> <E7pGE8.21v@watserv3.uwaterloo.ca> <hatunenE7pK18.n1L@netcom.com> <5he5lg$hs8@flood.weeg.uiowa.edu> <5heubn$r3v@gap.cco.caltech.edu> <5hhq2q$fr1@usenet.rpi.edu> <5j4pis$3ka$1@nnrp01.primenet.com> <dlawson-1804970653040001@news2.aimnet.com> <Pine.HPP.3.91.970418125337.19713E-100000@pwic045.ks.boeing.com> Organization: TableTop Publications X-NETCOM-Date: Sat Apr 19 4:03:46 AM CDT 1997 Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle,alt.conspiracy,alt.folklore.science,hsv.general,alt.folklore.urban,rec.models.rockets