Article View: sci.space.shuttle
Article #980Re: SRBs
From: KeithPetto Alexander
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 1990 16:43
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 1990 16:43
22 lines
1424 bytes
1424 bytes
In article <4109@orion.cf.uci.edu>, dkrause@orion.oac.uci.edu (Doug Krause)
says:
>
>In article <1990Jan10.142852.23804@phri.nyu.edu> roy@phri.nyu.edu (Roy Smith)
>writes:
># Watching the 30-second video on the news of yesterday's shuttle
>#launch, I noticed that the SRBs were still burning when they separated, and
>#kept doing so for at least a few seconds (i.e. as long as they showed
>#them). To me, this means they waste some significant fraction of the SRB
>#thrust after separation. Is that really true?
>
>It's probably better to separate while they are still burning, before
>they become dead weight.
Yes, they also have been known to cause problems (explosions and such)
so I would think it would be a good idea to jetison them as soon as
they are no longer needed. Less variables, less to go wrong, we hope.
-------
Petto :->
"The opinions expressed above may or may not be my own."
kda101@psuvm.bitnet
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<90010.114320KDA101@PSUVM.BITNET>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!kda101References:
<1990Jan10.142852.23804@phri.nyu.edu> <4109@orion.cf.uci.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!kda101 From: KDA101@PSUVM.BITNET (KeithPetto Alexander) Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle Subject: Re: SRBs Message-ID: <90010.114320KDA101@PSUVM.BITNET> Date: 10 Jan 90 16:43:20 GMT References: <1990Jan10.142852.23804@phri.nyu.edu> <4109@orion.cf.uci.edu> Organization: Penn State University Lines: 22