🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.space.shuttle
Article #989

Re: SRBs

#989
From: Norman C. Kluksdahl
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 1990 03:17
16 lines
1212 bytes
In article <1990Jan10.142852.23804@phri.nyu.edu> roy@phri.nyu.edu (Roy Smith) writes:
>
>I noticed that the SRBs were still burning when they separated, and
>kept doing so for at least a few seconds (i.e. as long as they showed
>them).  To me, this means they waste some significant fraction of the SRB
>thrust after separation.  Is that really true?

The SRBs may still be burning when they are jettisoned, but they may
not be producing USEFUL thrust.  If the thrust from an SRB is less than
its combined mass and contribution to atmospheric drag, it is dead weight,
and actually detracts from the useful payload, since the SSMEs must
carry the difference.

=====================================================================
Norman Kluksdahl  
  ...!nuchat!moe
Technical Details
Message-ID: <18298@nuchat.UUCP>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!uhnix1!nuchat!moe
References: <1990Jan10.142852.23804@phri.nyu.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!uhnix1!nuchat!moe
From: moe@nuchat.UUCP (Norman C. Kluksdahl)
Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle
Subject: Re: SRBs
Message-ID: <18298@nuchat.UUCP>
Date: 11 Jan 90 03:17:12 GMT
References: <1990Jan10.142852.23804@phri.nyu.edu>
Reply-To: moe@nuchat.UUCP (Norman C. Kluksdahl)
Organization: Houston Public Access
Lines: 16