Thread View: sci.space.shuttle
3 messages
3 total messages
Started by Michael Peirce
Thu, 24 Dec 1992 03:33
Re: STS-1 Disaster -- follow-up #2
Author: Michael Peirce
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 03:33
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1992 03:33
24 lines
1723 bytes
1723 bytes
In article <78159@ncratl.AtlantaGA.NCR.COM> (sci.space.shuttle,alt.conspiracy,talk.politics.misc), mwilson@ncratl.AtlantaGA.NCR.COM (Mark Wilson) writes: > In article <1h3059INNq8n@news.cerf.net>, eidetics@nic.cerf.net (Eidetics Int'l) writes: > | 8) One source that you may want to use for your research is "Aviation Week and > | Space Technology". This weekly industry journal has reported every shuttle > | flight in great detail. They go to great lengths to find and report on > | secret or classified data. You will find not a hint about the secret flight. > | > | THEY ARE EITHER IGNORANT THEMSELVES, OR AFRAID TO SAY ANYTHING. > > Considering the average shuttle launch can be seen for several hundred > miles, how did they manage to launch one, and NOBODY noticed. It's obvious: secret bases in the Pacific. :-) Also, oops they're coming for me, gotta run..... -- Michael Peirce -- peirce@outpost.SF-Bay.org -- Peirce Software -- Suite 301, 719 Hibiscus Place -- -- San Jose, California USA 95117 -- Drop by booth #4463 -- voice: (408) 244-6554 fax: (408) 244-6882 -- at MacWorld Expo/SF -- AppleLink: peirce & America Online: AFC Peirce
Re: STS-1 Disaster -- follow-up #2
Author: Simon E. Booth
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 22:20
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 22:20
22 lines
1806 bytes
1806 bytes
In article <D2150035.lsrsh6@outpost.SF-Bay.org> peirce@outpost.SF-Bay.org (Michael Peirce) writes: > >In article <78159@ncratl.AtlantaGA.NCR.COM> (sci.space.shuttle,alt.conspiracy,talk.politics.misc), mwilson@ncratl.AtlantaGA.NCR.COM (Mark Wilson) writes: >> In article <1h3059INNq8n@news.cerf.net>, eidetics@nic.cerf.net (Eidetics Int'l) writes: >> | 8) One source that you may want to use for your research is "Aviation Week and >> | Space Technology". This weekly industry journal has reported every shuttle >> | flight in great detail. They go to great lengths to find and report on >> | secret or classified data. You will find not a hint about the secret flight. >> | >> | THEY ARE EITHER IGNORANT THEMSELVES, OR AFRAID TO SAY ANYTHING. >> >> Considering the average shuttle launch can be seen for several hundred >> miles, how did they manage to launch one, and NOBODY noticed. > >It's obvious: secret bases in the Pacific. No, it was underground silos in Brazil! :-) (see the James Bond film 'Moonraker' for more details. I always wondered how one could launch 6 shuttles from underground without anyone seeing them launch, and without anyone feeling the ground shaking) Simon
Re: STS-1 Disaster -- follow-up #2
Author: Steve Lamont
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 22:50
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 22:50
14 lines
1270 bytes
1270 bytes
In article <1992Dec27.222007.28325@ringer.cs.utsa.edu> sbooth@lonestar.utsa.edu (Simon E. Booth) writes: >(see the James Bond film 'Moonraker' for more details. I always wondered >how one could launch 6 shuttles from underground without anyone seeing >them launch, and without anyone feeling the ground shaking) Easy. If everyone is a Replicant -- er -- I mean, Robotiod -- they can be simply programmed not to feel it. spl -- Steve Lamont, SciViGuy -- (619) 534-7968 -- spl@szechuan.ucsd.edu UCSD Microscopy and Imaging Resource/UCSD Med School/La Jolla, CA 92093-0608 Where is the summer, the unimaginable Zero summer? - T.S. Eliot, "Little Gidding"
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads