Article View: sci.space
Article #110Re: Mini-asteroids part two.
From: "Phil G. Fraering"
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1992 19:34
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1992 19:34
57 lines
2835 bytes
2835 bytes
>Since the Tunguska event is thought to have been due to a 40 meter
>body, and such events were calculated to occur once every 2 to 3
>centuries, something is screwy here.
I've done some more thinking about this. Let's fudge the properties
of these objects so that they don't conflict with what we've already
seen:
Specifically, let's make them low density, so they don't hold together
well, or last long enough in the atmosphere to cause a big show.
Snow would be an ideal candidate.
Of course, if they were bare ice, they'd be bright, so let's give
them a coating of that gooey stuff that was on the rings of
Uranus and Neptune, to make them more reasonably dark.
Now they also absorb radar signals.
But this sounds too much like _that_ guy's theory, so it can't
be right...
>The orbits of the bodies are unexpectedly similar to Earth's.
>Two have orbits more like earth's than any known body; one was that
>asteroid that was mistaken for a spent rocket body.
>These couldn't be Frank's minicomets, could they? His putative
>objects are supposedly in prograde, earth-like orbits, to reduce the
>impact velocity enough to avoid observational constraints.
Now that I think about it, Frank has (again going from memory)
specified the orbital parameters of these hypothetical bodies pretty
closely...
These might be the _slower_ members of the population...
> Paul F. Dietz
> dietz@cs.rochester.edu
Disclaimer: I don't know; I'm just guessing.
Anyone here read _The Big Splash_?
--
Phil Fraering pgf@srl0x.cacs.usl.edu where the x is a number from 1-5.
Phone: 318/365-5418 SnailMail: 2408 Blue Haven Dr., New Iberia, La. 70560
---------------------
Disclaimer: Some reasonably forseeable events may exceed this
message's capability to protect from severe injury, death, widespread
disaster, astronomically significant volumes of space approaching a
state of markedly increaced entropy, or taxes.
The world will end tomorrow.
NASA scientists note that this was the way the system was
designed to operate.
- From the Nov. Focus in Sky and Telescope, on a hypothetical
NASA press release on something hitting the Earth...
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BwwEKv.8qE.1@cs.cmu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!ames!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!pgf@srl05.cacs.usl.eduShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.space
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!ames!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!pgf@srl05.cacs.usl.edu
From: pgf@srl05.cacs.usl.edu ("Phil G. Fraering")
Subject: Re: Mini-asteroids part two.
Message-ID: <BwwEKv.8qE.1@cs.cmu.edu>
X-Added: Forwarded by Space Digest
Sender: news+@cs.cmu.edu
Organization: [via International Space University]
Original-Sender: isu@VACATION.VENARI.CS.CMU.EDU
Distribution: sci
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1992 19:34:37 GMT
Approved: bboard-news_gateway
Lines: 58